§Why CasetextPricing

Lafever v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al

MOTION to Quash Subpoenas served

15 Cited authorities

  1. Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.

    281 F.3d 726 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 164 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party cannot depose opposing counsel absent showing the attorney's testimony is relevant, that the information he or she has is critical to the deponent's case, and no other information source exists

  2. Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp.

    323 F.3d 55 (1st Cir. 2003)   Cited 109 times
    Stating that where state law is undecided the federal court, when practicable, must make a fair prediction concerning how the state's highest court would decide if presented with the issue

  3. Spell v. McDaniel

    591 F. Supp. 1090 (E.D.N.C. 1984)   Cited 112 times
    Adopting principle stated in Duffy

  4. Gould Inc. v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co.

    825 F.2d 676 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 89 times
    Finding that work-product rule requires "existence of a real, rather than speculative, concern"

  5. In re McVane

    44 F.3d 1127 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that corporations "can claim no equality with individuals in the enjoyment of a right to privacy"

  6. BSN Medical, Inc. v. Parker Medical Associates, LLC

    No. 10 Misc. 15 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2011)   Cited 3 times

    No. 10 Misc. 15. January 19, 2011 Memorandum Opinion Order JOHN KEENAN, Senior District Judge I. Background Plaintiff BSN Medical, Inc. ("BSN") designs, manufactures, and sells medical supplies. Defendant Bruce Parker is the general partner and President of Parker Medical Associates ("Parker Medical"). BSN alleges that in the 1980's, Bruce Parker developed a synthetic splinting product called Ortho-Glass; in 1996, he sold all of the Ortho-Glass business, including the patents and other intellectual

  7. DUFF v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES

    Case No.8:09-CIV-374-T-33TGW (M.D. Fla. Sep. 26, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    Case No. 8:09-CIV-374-T-33TGW. September 26, 2011 ORDER VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ, District Judge This cause is before the Court on the Medical Defendants (Prison Health Services, Inc.; Karen Riley, R.N.; Arron Scoggins, P.A.; and Jean Augustin, M.D.)'s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 100) and Plaintiff Duff's response in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 102). Because the "record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for Duff, there is no genuine issue for

  8. Faith Satellite Radio v. Lutheran Church Missouri Synod

    Civil Action No. 10-1373 (CKK) (D.D.C. Oct. 4, 2010)   Cited 1 times
    Holding that a premature subpoena placed an undue burden, although not imposing sanctions pending the response of the issuing party

  9. McKINSTRY v. IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC.

    Civil Action File No. 1:05-CV-3119-CC-AJB (N.D. Ga. Aug. 10, 2006)   Cited 1 times

    Civil Action File No. 1:05-CV-3119-CC-AJB. August 10, 2006 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALAN BAVERMAN, Magistrate Judge Before the Court are various discovery related motions that Plaintiff and Defendant have filed. Plaintiff has filed the following six motions: (1) Motion for Subpoena, [Doc. 36]; (2) Motion for Compliance with the Pleadings, [Doc. 38]; (3) Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, [Doc. 41]; (4) Motion to Quash Subpoenas, [Doc. 42]; (5) Motion for Sanctions, [Doc. 44]; and (6) Motion

  10. Alexander v. Rizzo

    50 F.R.D. 374 (E.D. Pa. 1970)   Cited 9 times

    Civil rights case, wherein defendants moved for protective order and motion to relieve them from answering certain interrogatories and from answering certain requests for admissions. The District Court, John W. Lord, Jr., Chief Judge, held that where the civil rights case was intimately related to matters and procedures of city police department and information sought to be discovered was obviously necessary, even though defendants asserted that completion of the requested discovery would require

  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,831 times   669 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  12. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,891 times   108 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

  13. Rule 609 - Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

    Fed. R. Evid. 609   Cited 4,462 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a ten-year time limit, absent unusual circumstances, on the use of prior convictions for impeachment purposes

  14. Rule 2 - One Form of Action

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 2   Cited 697 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing for "one form of action to be known as 'civil action,'" in lieu of discretely labeled actions at law and suits in equity

  15. Section 13A-8-192 - Identity theft

    Ala. Code § 13A-8-192   Cited 7 times

    (a) A person commits the crime of identity theft if, without the authorization, consent, or permission of the victim, and with the intent to defraud for his or her own benefit or the benefit of a third person, he or she does any of the following: (1) Obtains, records, or accesses identifying information that would assist in accessing financial resources, obtaining identification documents, or obtaining benefits of the victim. (2) Obtains goods or services through the use of identifying information