§Why CasetextPricing

Labow v. Department of Justice

Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.

    435 U.S. 589 (1978)   Cited 6,072 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing" can constitute a sufficient reason to preserve records under seal

  2. Milner v. Department of the Navy

    562 U.S. 2011 (2011)   Cited 716 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that FOIA exemptions are "explicitly made exclusive"

  3. Senate of Puerto Rico v. U.S. Dept of Justice

    823 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 490 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the Government to invoke other FOIA exemptions after its initial reliance on 7 "collapse[d]," and leaving open the question of whether the conclusion of law-enforcement proceedings constitutes a "substantial change in the factual context of the case" sufficient to invoke an appellate court's section 2106 discretion to remand

  4. Pub. Emps. for Envtl. Responsibility v. U.S. Section, International Boundary & Water Comm'n

    740 F.3d 195 (D.C. Cir. 2014)   Cited 155 times
    Holding documents satisfied threshold showing where they described security precautions to be implemented by law enforcement personnel around dams during emergency conditions

  5. In re Cheney

    406 F.3d 723 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 189 times
    Holding that "if there is no clear and compelling duty under the statute as interpreted, the district court must dismiss the action."

  6. Maydak v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

    218 F.3d 760 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 145 times
    Holding that government has the burden of proving each claimed FOIA exemption

  7. Rosenfeld v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

    57 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that use of a pretext phone call did not qualify for protection because the technique is generally known to the public

  8. Labow v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

    831 F.3d 523 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that documents subpoenaed by a grand jury are not by their nature a "matter occurring before the grand jury" but that the context of the disclosure could make such documents Rule 6(e) material

  9. Anderson v. Carter

    802 F.3d 4 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that sovereign immunity barred the plaintiff's APA claims against the Secretary of Defense and subordinate officers in their official capacity because they did not meet the APA's definition of "agency"

  10. In re Sealing & Non-Disclosure of Pen/Trap/2703(D) Orders

    562 F. Supp. 2d 876 (S.D. Tex. 2008)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that nondisclosure orders of indefinite duration violated the First Amendment and the common law right of public access to courts

  11. Section 3123 - Issuance of an order for a pen register or a trap and trace device

    18 U.S.C. § 3123   Cited 121 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Requiring certification by the applicant "that the information likely to be obtained ... is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation"

  12. Section 3127 - Definitions for chapter

    18 U.S.C. § 3127   Cited 98 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining pen register