§Why CasetextPricing

Kuriakose v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re: 127 MOTION to Declare Unenforceable the Non Participation Clause.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    938 F.2d 383 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 198 times
    Holding that claims for damages against assuming bank for its own acts did not fall within jurisdictional bar of subsection because "they seek neither payment from nor a determination of rights with respect to the assets of [the bank-in-receivership]" but from the assuming bank

  2. Freeman v. F.D.I.C

    56 F.3d 1394 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 166 times
    Holding that § 1821(d) is not limited to creditors' claims but extends to debtors' claims

  3. Falconbridge U.S., Inc. v. Bank One Illinois, N.A. (In re Vic Supply Co.)

    227 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 28 times
    Noting that "[a]cceptance can be effectuated by performance as well as by a signature"

  4. National Trust v. F.D.I.C

    21 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Discussing operation of anti-injunction provision of § 1821(j), and noting existence of claims procedure as alternative to injunctive relief

  5. 281-300 Joint Venture v. Onion

    938 F.2d 35 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that "the ability of the conservator to foreclose on the property of a debtor [is] a power that Congress gave to [agencies like the FDIC] under FIRREA"

  6. Volges v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    32 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that the fact that the RTC's actions might violate some other provision of law does not render the anti-injunction provision inapplicable

  7. Ward v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    996 F.2d 99 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that § 1821(j) deprives a district court from enjoining or rescinding a sale by the RTC of the assets of a failed thrift

  8. In re Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma, Inc.

    973 F.2d 283 (4th Cir. 1992)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to enjoin the RTC, acting as conservator of a failed thrift, from exercising its ownership rights over the thrift's subsidiaries

  9. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. Federal Deposit Insurance

    995 F.2d 238 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that section 1821(j) bars suit for injunctive relief where the FDIC acts in accordance with the powers granted to it by Congress

  10. Xerox Corporation v. Media Sciences, Inc.

    609 F. Supp. 2d 319 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 4 times

    No. 06 Civ. 4872 (RJH). March 30, 2009. James Gerard McCarney, Howrey LLP, New York, NY, Jennifer L. Dzwonczyk, Jim W. Ko, Joseph P. Lavelle, Howrey Simon Arnold White LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Anthony P. La Rocco, Kirkpatrick Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, LLP, Newark, NJ, Hunter D. Keeton, James J. Foster, Lawrence M. Green, Wolf, Greenfield Sacks, P.C., Boston, MA, William N. Hebert, Seung Lee, Calvo Clark, LLP, William H. Hebert, Kirkpatrick Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, San Francisco;

  11. Section 1821 - Insurance Funds

    12 U.S.C. § 1821   Cited 2,938 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Granting FDIC standing to bring civil actions for money damages against the Bank's directors as the successor

  12. Section 4617 - Authority over critically undercapitalized regulated entities

    12 U.S.C. § 4617   Cited 666 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting the FHFA the power to “operate” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and “to conduct all [of their] business”

  13. Section 7106 - Management rights

    5 U.S.C. § 7106   Cited 189 times
    Specifying the management rights over which agencies have no duty to bargain

  14. Section 4502 - Definitions

    12 U.S.C. § 4502   Cited 18 times
    Defining “conforming mortgage”