12 Cited authorities

Comer v. Cisneros
37 F.3d 775 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 281 times
Holding that equal protection claimants had standing where they were denied "the missed opportunity" to compete for suburban housing on "an equal footing"
German v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg.
896 F. Supp. 1385 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) Cited 194 times
Concluding that the plaintiffs pleaded their IIED cause of action sufficiently where landlords knowingly exposed tenants to lead paint, “a highly toxic substance to children,” thereby putting them at risk for physical and mental injuries
Kruse v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc.
383 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 2004) Cited 99 times
Holding that the text of Section 8(b) was ambiguous as to markups because the interpretations urged by both sides were reasonable but that Chevron deference was warranted because Statement of Policy 2001-1 was promulgated in accordance with the legislative delegation of authority
U.S. v. State of Wash
86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 115 times
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding prejudice where intervention would complicate the issues, and upset a delicate balance achieved after years of litigation
McNeill v. N.Y. Hous. Auth.
719 F. Supp. 233 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) Cited 102 times
Holding that risk of eviction from Section 8 housing satisfies irreparable injury prong of preliminary injunction test
Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
167 F.R.D. 6 (E.D.N.Y. 1996) Cited 37 times
Noting that the Second Circuit has held that "the stare decisis effect of a court's decision is sufficient to demonstrate the requisite impairment of an interest to support a motion to intervene."
Eckert v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
227 F.R.D. 60 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) Cited 25 times
Allowing intervention as of right when named party had settled individual claims and could therefore "no longer adequately represent the interests" of the class to be certified
Swan v. Stoneman
635 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1980) Cited 45 times
No. 1080, Docket 79-7729. Argued April 30, 1980. Decided October 17, 1980. James C. May, Springfield, Vt. (Neil Mickenberg, Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Springfield, Vermont, on brief), for intervenors-appellants. Geoffrey A. Yudien, Asst. Atty. Gen., Waterbury, Vt. (M. Jerome Diamond, Atty. Gen., Waterbury, Vt., on brief), for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. Before LUMBARD, VAN GRAAFEILAND and KEARSE, Circuit Judges. KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
German v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.
899 F. Supp. 1155 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) Cited 9 times
Allowing intervention of additional named plaintiffs in a certified class action who "are appropriate class members and will provide the Court with additional material to review as this case progresses"
Engra, Inc. v. Gabel
958 F.2d 643 (5th Cir. 1992) Cited 6 times
Finding it significant that the would-be intervenor "could just as easily have pursued this claim in state court"
Rule 24 - Intervention
Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 Cited 9,166 times 34 Legal Analyses
Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them
Section 2607 - Prohibition against kickbacks and unearned fees
12 U.S.C. § 2607 Cited 1,320 times 53 Legal Analyses
Holding persons who violate § 2607 jointly and severally liable to persons charged with settlement services

Kruse et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

12 Cited authorities

Holding that equal protection claimants had standing where they were denied "the missed opportunity" to compete for suburban housing on "an equal footing"

Concluding that the plaintiffs pleaded their IIED cause of action sufficiently where landlords knowingly exposed tenants to lead paint, “a highly toxic substance to children,” thereby putting them at risk for physical and mental injuries

Holding that the text of Section 8(b) was ambiguous as to markups because the interpretations urged by both sides were reasonable but that Chevron deference was warranted because Statement of Policy 2001-1 was promulgated in accordance with the legislative delegation of authority

Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding prejudice where intervention would complicate the issues, and upset a delicate balance achieved after years of litigation

Holding that risk of eviction from Section 8 housing satisfies irreparable injury prong of preliminary injunction test

Noting that the Second Circuit has held that "the stare decisis effect of a court's decision is sufficient to demonstrate the requisite impairment of an interest to support a motion to intervene."

Allowing intervention as of right when named party had settled individual claims and could therefore "no longer adequately represent the interests" of the class to be certified

Allowing intervention of additional named plaintiffs in a certified class action who "are appropriate class members and will provide the Court with additional material to review as this case progresses"

Finding it significant that the would-be intervenor "could just as easily have pursued this claim in state court"

Granting the right of intervention to qualifying persons "unless existing parties adequately represent" them

Holding persons who violate § 2607 jointly and severally liable to persons charged with settlement services