31 Cited authorities

Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (1962) Cited 28,618 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal
American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah
414 U.S. 538 (1974) Cited 2,115 times 162 Legal Analyses
Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"
Sosna v. Iowa
419 U.S. 393 (1975) Cited 1,733 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that the requisite Article III "case or controversy" may exist "between a named defendant and a member of the class represented by the named plaintiff, even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot"
Crown, Cork Seal Co. v. Parker
462 U.S. 345 (1983) Cited 1,104 times 54 Legal Analyses
Holding that the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations for all asserted members of the putative class until a class certification decision is made
Indianapolis School Comm'rs v. Jacobs
420 U.S. 128 (1975) Cited 298 times
Holding that a class action is moot unless it was duly certified pursuant to Rule 23 and a controversy still exists between the present members of the class and the defendant
Andrews v. Orr
851 F.2d 146 (6th Cir. 1988) Cited 581 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the instant suit "ceased to be a class action," and tolling ended, upon entry of order denying class certification
Krim v. pcOrder.com, Inc.
402 F.3d 489 (5th Cir. 2005) Cited 300 times
Affirming dismissal of Section 11 claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs could not prove shares traceable to offering, but had submitted expert evidence showing there was a 99.85% statistical likelihood that shares were from offering
In re American Exp. Co. Shareholder Litigation
39 F.3d 395 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 257 times
Holding that "leave to amend may be denied if the amendment would be futile"
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
975 F.2d 964 (3d Cir. 1992) Cited 219 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the named plaintiff has the requisite personal stake in class certification only if he has a live individual claim when the district court decides the class certification issue, or at the very least, he had a live claim when he filed for class certification . . ."
Leonelli v. Pennwalt Corp.
887 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir. 1989) Cited 194 times
Holding that leave to amend is properly denied when an amendment would be futile
Section 1391 - Venue generally
28 U.S.C. § 1391 Cited 27,804 times 197 Legal Analyses
Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
Section 2614 - Jurisdiction of courts; limitations
12 U.S.C. § 2614 Cited 1,261 times 3 Legal Analyses
Granting RESPA jurisdiction to federal district courts and "any other court of competent jurisdiction"

Kruse et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

31 Cited authorities

Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal

Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"

Holding that the requisite Article III "case or controversy" may exist "between a named defendant and a member of the class represented by the named plaintiff, even though the claim of the named plaintiff has become moot"

Holding that the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations for all asserted members of the putative class until a class certification decision is made

Holding that a class action is moot unless it was duly certified pursuant to Rule 23 and a controversy still exists between the present members of the class and the defendant

Holding that the instant suit "ceased to be a class action," and tolling ended, upon entry of order denying class certification

Affirming dismissal of Section 11 claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs could not prove shares traceable to offering, but had submitted expert evidence showing there was a 99.85% statistical likelihood that shares were from offering

Holding that "leave to amend may be denied if the amendment would be futile"

Holding that "the named plaintiff has the requisite personal stake in class certification only if he has a live individual claim when the district court decides the class certification issue, or at the very least, he had a live claim when he filed for class certification . . ."

Holding that leave to amend is properly denied when an amendment would be futile

Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred

Granting RESPA jurisdiction to federal district courts and "any other court of competent jurisdiction"