§Why CasetextPricing

Kristensen v. Credit Payment Services Inc.

REPLY to 262 Response to 239 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 236 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 233 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 240 MOTION for Summary Judgment

3 Cited authorities

  1. Whartenby v. Reay

    92 Cal. 74 (Cal. 1891)   Cited 2 times

    Department One Hearing In Bank Denied. Motion to dismiss an appeal. COUNSEL George E. Lawrence, for Appellants. A. N. Drown, for Respondent. OPINION THE COURT This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, upon the ground that no transcript of the record has been filed in this court. It is conceded by appellant that the time allowed by law for filing the transcript expired long since, but he insists that the attorney who filed the moving papers has no authority to act in the matter. The attorney in the lower

  2. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 333,232 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  3. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"