Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
437 U.S. 340 (1978) Cited 4,385 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."
In re Phenylpropanolamine
460 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 4,426 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[f]ailing to produce documents" and "unreasonable delay" both support the court's finding of prejudice
U.S. v. Int'l Union of Petro. Indus. Wkrs
870 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1989) Cited 354 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that international union lacked legal control over documents in the possession of local unions because they were separate entities and the contract governing the union relationship did not expressly give the international the right to obtain the records of local unions upon demand
Narula v. Chase Home Fin., LLC
2:11-cv -01641- PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 30, 2012)2:11-cv-01641-PMP -VCF 10-30-2012 SOMCHAI NARULA Plaintiff, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, Defendant. CAM FERENBACH ORDER (Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents #14) Before the court is plaintiff Somchai Narula's Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. (#14). Defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC (hereinafter "Chase") filed an Opposition (#21), and plaintiff filed a Reply (#22). The court held a hearing on September
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,817 times 651 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 45,850 times 319 Legal AnalysesHolding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
Section 227 - Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
47 U.S.C. § 227 Cited 5,659 times 733 Legal AnalysesGranting exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts over actions brought by state attorney generals