23 Cited authorities

  1. Link v. Wabash Railroad Co.

    370 U.S. 626 (1962)   Cited 24,565 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 41(b)'s allowance for a party to move to dismiss for failure to prosecute did not implicitly abrogate the court's power to dismiss sua sponte
  2. Ladien v. Astrachan

    128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,840 times
    In Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051, 1056 n. 5 (7th Cir. 1997), we noted that the overlap between Rules 41(b) and 37(b) — both cover failures to comply with orders of the court — and the slightly different requirements for justifying dismissal under each rule pose a conflict.
  3. Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.

    529 U.S. 460 (2000)   Cited 259 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding amendment did not relate back where plaintiff knew of the party's "role and existence" and added the new party only after learning the named defendant could not satisfy the judgment
  4. Ciomber v. Cooperative

    527 F.3d 635 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 539 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the non-movant's Local Rule 56.1(b)(B) response "contained several extremely long, argumentative paragraphs, and in those paragraphs [the non-movant] simultaneously denied the veracity of [the movant's] proposed material facts and presented additional facts of his own..., the district court did not err by refusing to consider the facts he proposed"
  5. Salgado v. Gen. Motors

    150 F.3d 735 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that "the district court acted well within its discretion when it imposed the sanction of excluding the testimony of the expert witness" because the party had failed to comply with the court's scheduling order
  6. Tribble v. Evangelides

    670 F.3d 753 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 189 times
    Finding "willfulness" under Rule 37(c) where the defendants "knew that they wanted to elicit exactly the testimony that they did" but failed to make the disclosure required by Rule 26
  7. Easley v. Kirmsee

    382 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 180 times
    Holding that litigants have duty of diligence to inquire about status of case and to seek clarification of court rules
  8. Finley v. Marathon Oil Co.

    75 F.3d 1225 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 177 times
    Affirming exclusion of rebuttal expert evidence disclosed only a few days before trial
  9. U.S. v. Golden Elevator, Inc.

    27 F.3d 301 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 114 times
    Upholding decision to dismiss case with prejudice as a result of plaintiff's repeated failure to comply with court orders
  10. Halas v. Consumer Services, Inc.

    16 F.3d 161 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that plaintiff's failure to comply with a court's order requiring him to attend his properly noticed deposition warranted dismissal of his case as an appropriate sanction
  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  12. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 47,073 times   326 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
  13. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 34,667 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  14. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  15. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,452 times   152 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."
  16. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 11,139 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)