§Why CasetextPricing

Korsmo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al

MOTION

3 Cited authorities

  1. Reales v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

    84 F.3d 993 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 98 times
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs a fourth extension of time to respond to summary judgment motion and in proceeding to decision on summary judgment

  2. Haynes v. Dart

    Civil Action No.: 08 C 4834 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 11, 2010)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Civil Action No.: 08 C 4834. January 11, 2010 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUZANNE CONLON, District Judge Derrick Haynes, Thomas M. Perconti, Charles B. Hill, and Fred Rogers (collectively "plaintiffs") are mentally ill pre-trial detainees at the Cook County Jail who allegedly have been deprived of mental health treatment, humane confinement conditions, adequate grievance procedures, and access to the courts. In a purported class action, they sue Cook County, Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart, and

  3. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,387 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."