§Why CasetextPricing

Kohen et al v. Pacific Investment Mgmt Company LLC et al

MOTION for Temporary Stay of Proceedings

4 Cited authorities

  1. Touhy v. Ragen

    340 U.S. 462 (1951)   Cited 659 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subordinate agency employee cannot be compelled to comply with a subpoena duces tecum where a valid agency regulation prohibits such compliance in the absence of agency authorization, and where no authorization has been granted

  2. Section 12 - Public disclosure

    7 U.S.C. § 12   Cited 38 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the CFTC "shall disclose information in its possession pursuant to a subpoena or summons only if," at least fourteen days before disclosure, the agency mails a copy of the subpoena or summons "to the last known home or business address of the person who submitted the information" or "provides other appropriate notice of the subpoena or summons to such person"

  3. Section 17.00 - Information to be furnished by futures commission merchants, clearing members and foreign brokers

    17 C.F.R. § 17.00   Cited 2 times
    Discussing reports that futures commission merchants must file

  4. Section 144.3 - Testimony by present or former Commission employees

    17 C.F.R. § 144.3   Cited 1 times

    (a) In any proceeding to which the Commission is not a party, an employee of the Commission shall not testify concerning matters related to the business of the Commission unless authorized to do so by the Commission upon the advice of the General Counsel. (b) In any proceeding, an employee or former employee of the Commission shall not testify concerning non-public matters related to the business of the Commission unless authorized to do so by the Commission upon the advice of the General Counsel