15 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 253,227 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 267,097 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Neitzke v. Williams

    490 U.S. 319 (1989)   Cited 55,858 times
    Holding that "an in forma pauperis pro se complaint may only be dismissed as frivolous ... when the petitioner cannot make any claim with a rational or arguable basis in law or in fact"
  4. Phillips v. County of Allegheny

    515 F.3d 224 (3d Cir. 2008)   Cited 16,859 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court need not permit a curative amendment if such amendment would be futile
  5. Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside

    578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14,107 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
  6. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital

    425 U.S. 738 (1976)   Cited 6,278 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a conspiracy against a North Carolina hospital had "a substantial effect on interstate commerce," and hence was covered by the Sherman Act, because it could, inter alia, reduce the hospital's purchases of out-of-state medicines and supplies
  7. Board of Trustees v. Wettlin Assoc

    237 F.3d 270 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 188 times
    Holding that a TPA was a fiduciary where the TPA "wrote checks and disbursed assets from the fund's bank account" and "was not required to seek approval from the [plan] [t]rustees in advance"
  8. Badger v. Phila. Office of Prop. Assessment

    563 F. App'x 152 (3d Cir. 2014)   Cited 31 times

    No. 13-4637 04-15-2014 CORNELIUS A. BADGER, JR., Appellant v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT PER CURIAM NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 13-cv-04936) District Judge: Honorable Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 11, 2014 Before: AMBRO, SHWARTZ and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges OPINION PER CURIAM Cornelius A. Badger, Jr., appeals from an order

  9. Bishop v. Franchising

    248 F. App'x 298 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Affirming Bishop v. GNC Franchising LLC 403, F. Supp. 2d 411, 418-19 (W.D. Pa. 2005) and citing Witmer v. Exxon Corp., 434 A.2d 1222, 1226-27 (Pa. 1981)
  10. Barbee v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth

    323 F. App'x 159 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that evidence of the plaintiff's involvement in at least 24 prior civil suits was properly admitted for impeachment purposes, given that he "was evasive about prior lawsuits in his deposition"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,412 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 12101 - Findings and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 12101   Cited 23,357 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"
  13. Section 621 - Congressional statement of findings and purpose

    29 U.S.C. § 621   Cited 17,463 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs"
  14. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 8,824 times   99 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  15. Section 2601 - Findings and purposes

    29 U.S.C. § 2601   Cited 7,653 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Finding that there is inadequate job security for employees who have serious health conditions that prevent them from working for temporary periods