§Why CasetextPricing

Kline et al v. Mortgage Electronic Security Systems et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION to Strike 427 Response in Opposition to Motion Response to and Request to Strike Plaintiff's Memo in Opposition to Request for Default Judgment on Defendants' Reimer, Lorber and Lerner Sampson's Motions for Summary Judgm, 416 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 414 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 428 MOTION to Strike 426 MOTION for Disclosure Request for Status Conference, 427 Response in Opposition to Motion

8 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    497 U.S. 871 (1990)   Cited 9,662 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete

  2. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.

    403 F. App'x 166 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 784 times
    Holding that a district court abuses its discretion by failing to engage in this four-factor test or at least the "equitable analysis" captured by the test

  3. Stewart v. Coyne Textile Services

    212 F.R.D. 494 (S.D.W. Va. 2003)   Cited 24 times
    Finding the plaintiff "satisfied the good cause standard of Rule 16(b)" and noting a contrary ruling would "allow Defendants to benefit by their discovery violations by placing the onus on Plaintiff to seek amendment of her claims before Defendants have supplied their responses"

  4. HEIL v. BELLE STARR SALOON CASINO ANGIE'S INC

    CIV. 09-5074-JLV (D.S.D. Mar. 30, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    CIV. 09-5074-JLV. March 30, 2011 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND RECOMMENDATION AS TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES [DOCKET NO. 20] VERONICA DUFFY, Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on plaintiff Misty N. Heil's complaint alleging sexual harassment, creation of a hostile work environment, and retaliatory discharge and wrongful termination, in violation of Title VII ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq), and assault and battery

  5. Nosker v. Gill Bros. Trucking

    Case No. 06-0286-CV-W-REL (W.D. Mo. Feb. 20, 2007)

    Case No. 06-0286-CV-W-REL. February 20, 2007 ORDER ROBERT LARSEN, Magistrate Judge Before the court is defendants' motion to reconsider my February 20, 2007, order granting plaintiffs' motion to file a second amended complaint. In support of their motion, defendants point to the ECF entry on January 31, 2007, which reads as follows: MOTION to join Additional Parties and to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Michael R Tripp on behalf of Derek Nosker, Charlene Nosker. Suggestions in opposition/response

  6. Johnson v. Wendy's Restaurant

    Civil Action 2:05-CV-1060 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2006)

    Civil Action 2:05-CV-1060. September 22, 2006 OPINION AND ORDER NORAH KING, Magistrate Judge This is an employment action in which plaintiff alleges that her work hours were reduced and she was eventually terminated in retaliation for having complained of gender harassment and race discrimination at the workplace. Plaintiff asserts her claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. This matter is now before the Court on three motions filed by defendant: Motion to Compel

  7. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  8. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."