Matter of James Wilson Associates
965 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1992) Cited 409 timesHolding that § 1109(b) was not "intended to waive" this "limitation on standing"
United States v. Oros
578 F.3d 703 (7th Cir. 2009) Cited 211 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the district court erred in admitting summaries based on business records where there was no foundation for two of the "steps" under 803, explaining that "[w]ithout these steps, the government could not have laid the foundation necessary to demonstrate the admissibility, under the business records exception, of the underlying records or the summaries of those records."
Peabody Coal v. Dir., Off., Workers' Comp
165 F.3d 1126 (7th Cir. 1999) Cited 10 timesDescribing a twenty-four-year-old black lung case as "typically protracted"
Kay v. First Continental Trading, Inc.
976 F. Supp. 772 (N.D. Ill. 1997) Cited 2 timesExcluding an expert's otherwise "permissible" statistical model because the expert used "speculative" input values
Rule 703 - Bases of an Expert's Opinion Testimony
Fed. R. Evid. 703 Cited 4,752 times 26 Legal AnalysesExplaining that facts or data of a type upon which experts in the field would reasonably rely in forming an opinion need not be admissible in order for the expert's opinion based on the facts and data to be admitted
Rule 1006 - Summaries to Prove Content
Fed. R. Evid. 1006 Cited 1,748 times 6 Legal AnalysesAllowing a "summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court."