8 Cited authorities

Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents
403 U.S. 388 (1971) Cited 26,107 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that there is an implied cause of action for money damages against federal officials for violations of the Fourth Amendment
Johnson v. U.S.
534 F.3d 958 (8th Cir. 2008) Cited 220 times
Holding that the state-law doctrine of apparent authority is not applicable under the FTCA
Buford v. Runyon
160 F.3d 1199 (8th Cir. 1998) Cited 188 times
Holding there was no breach of duty of fair representation when two employees' cases were similarly treated but received different outcomes
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 351,086 times 937 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 91,980 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 70,485 times 126 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 2671 - Definitions
28 U.S.C. § 2671 Cited 9,474 times 6 Legal Analyses
Defining "[e]mployee of the government" for purposes of the FTCA as "officers or employees of any federal agency "
Section 50.15 - Representation of Federal officials and employees by Department of Justice attorneys or by private counsel furnished by the Department in civil, criminal, and congressional proceedings in which Federal employees are sued, subpoenaed, or charged in their individual capacities
28 C.F.R. § 50.15 Cited 104 times
Permitting reimbursement of Department of Justice employees when the Attorney General finds reimbursement appropriate

King v. USA

8 Cited authorities

Holding that there is an implied cause of action for money damages against federal officials for violations of the Fourth Amendment

Holding that the state-law doctrine of apparent authority is not applicable under the FTCA

Holding there was no breach of duty of fair representation when two employees' cases were similarly treated but received different outcomes

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Defining "[e]mployee of the government" for purposes of the FTCA as "officers or employees of any federal agency "

Permitting reimbursement of Department of Justice employees when the Attorney General finds reimbursement appropriate