17 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 204,929 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is 'genuine,' that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

    552 U.S. 148 (2008)   Cited 1,025 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States

    406 U.S. 128 (1972)   Cited 1,536 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding bank jointly and severally liable with its employees, without explanation
  4. Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corp.

    63 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 1995)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that the employer's determination that the employee's doctor did not provide a valid certification of disability was permissible; the employer could require that employee to return to work under Section 510; and that "[e]ven if [the employer] was mistaken in its evaluation of [the employee's] disability, as long as that determination was in good faith and formed the basis of the decision it is permissible under section 510"
  5. Rogers v. Fair

    902 F.2d 140 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 214 times
    Reviewing denial of summary judgment when coupled with denial of qualified immunity
  6. Barker v. American Mobil Power Corp.

    64 F.3d 1397 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 98 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " fiduciary has an obligation to convey complete and accurate information material to the beneficiary's circumstance, even when a beneficiary has not specifically asked for the information"
  7. Farr v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.

    151 F.3d 908 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that, even though defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to inform plaintiffs about the potential tax consequences of the lump sum distributions of their pension benefits, § 1132 did not authorize recovery of compensatory damages for the tax benefits losses
  8. Mauser v. Raytheon Co. Pension Plan

    239 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2001)   Cited 53 times
    Noting but declining to reach the issue
  9. In re First American Corp.

    263 F.R.D. 549 (C.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that certain named ERISA plan participants have standing to serve as class representatives under U.S. Const Art. III
  10. In re Computer Sciences Corp. Erisa Litigation

    635 F. Supp. 2d 1128 (C.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 22 times
    Dismissing monitoring claim because upon finding that underlying prudence claim failed
  11. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 70,582 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  12. Section 1104 - Fiduciary duties

    29 U.S.C. § 1104   Cited 4,447 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Specifying duties of a "fiduciary . . . with respect to a plan"