28 Cited authorities

  1. Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth

    473 U.S. 614 (1985)   Cited 4,238 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act emphatically favors arbitration
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno

    454 U.S. 235 (1981)   Cited 4,740 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that potential change in law cannot, by itself, fend off dismissal under forum non conveniens absent showing that new law is "clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory"
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.

    407 U.S. 1 (1972)   Cited 4,537 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should enforce a choice-of-law clause when it is part of a "freely negotiated private international agreement"
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert

    330 U.S. 501 (1947)   Cited 5,603 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that private interest factors include the "availability of compulsory process for attendance of un-willing, and the cost of obtaining attendance of willing, witnesses"
  5. Murphy v. Schneider Nat'l, Inc.

    349 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 664 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the absence of factual findings made by the district court based upon an evidentiary hearing, affidavits and other evidence submitted by the non-moving party in the context of a Rule 12(b) challenge are to be viewed in the light most favorable to that party
  6. Manetti-Farrow, Inc. v. Gucci Am., Inc.

    858 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 730 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding tort claims were covered by a forum-selection clause because resolution of the tort claims required interpretation of the parties' contract
  7. Argueta v. Banco Mexicano, S.A

    87 F.3d 320 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 453 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion to dismiss based on a forum-selection clause should be treated "as a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss for improper venue."
  8. Lueck v. Sundstrand Corp.

    236 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 294 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Zipfel choice of law analysis is only determinative when the case involves a United States statute requiring venue in the United States, such as the Jones Act or the FELA
  9. Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd.

    969 F.2d 953 (10th Cir. 1992)   Cited 260 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the courts of England are fair and neutral forums"
  10. Marinechance Shipping, Ltd. v. Sebastian

    143 F.3d 216 (5th Cir. 1998)   Cited 202 times
    Holding that inherent authority to control docket authorized district court to decide order in which to hear and decide pending issues
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,341 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 69,116 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  13. Section 12101 - Findings and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 12101   Cited 23,351 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"
  14. Section 2615 - Prohibited acts

    29 U.S.C. § 2615   Cited 5,098 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Granting prescriptive rights
  15. Section 12900 - Short title

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12900   Cited 2,245 times   9 Legal Analyses

    This part may be known and referred to as the "California Fair Employment and Housing Act." Ca. Gov. Code § 12900 Amended by Stats 2022 ch 48 (SB 189),s 29, eff. 6/30/2022(amended Part heading). Added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 992.

  16. Rule 44.1 - Determining Foreign Law

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1   Cited 1,206 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Noting the court's determination of foreign law is treated as a question of law
  17. Section 12945.1 - Short title for sections 12945.2 and 19702.3

    Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.1   Cited 76 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Sections 12945.2 and 19702.3 shall be known, and may be cited, as the Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act. Ca. Gov. Code § 12945.1 Added by Stats. 1993, Ch. 580, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1994.