23 Cited authorities

  1. Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelder

    425 U.S. 185 (1976)   Cited 3,485 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 9(f) “contains a state-of-mind condition requiring something more than negligence”
  2. Novak v. Kasaks

    216 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,597 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding section 78u-4(b) does not literally require pleading of all facts, so long as facts pleaded provide adequate basis for believing statements were false
  3. Kalnit v. Eichler

    264 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 844 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a complaint “does not present facts indicating a clear duty to disclose” it does not establish “ strong evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness”
  4. San Leandro Emergen. Med. Plan v. Philip Morris

    75 F.3d 801 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 717 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a company's statements that it was "optimistic" about its earnings and "should deliver income growth consistent with its historically superior performance" was non-actionable "puffery"
  5. Chill v. General Electric Company

    101 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 650 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that general motives that can "be imputed to any publicly-owned, for-profit endeavor, [are] not sufficiently concrete for purposes of inferring scienter"
  6. Teams. Local 445 v. Dynex Cap

    531 F.3d 190 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 447 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs failed to allege corporate scienter where they did not specifically identify reports or statements to which the corporate officer had access that would have contradicted the allegedly fraudulent corporate statements at issue
  7. Freudenberg v. E*TRADE Financial Corp.

    712 F. Supp. 2d 171 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 136 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[t]rading plans are not a cognizable defense to scienter allegations on a motion to dismiss where, as here, they were adopted during the Class Period”
  8. Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.

    33 F. Supp. 3d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 78 times
    Acknowledging split among district courts
  9. In re Van Der Moolen Holding N.V. Securities Litigation

    405 F. Supp. 2d 388 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 91 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements which "put the sources of [the defendant's] revenue at issue" gave rise to Section 10(b) liability because the company failed to disclose the improper conduct that generated that revenue
  10. In re Universal, S.A. Sec. Litig.

    381 F. Supp. 2d 158 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements that a company was "financially solid" were actionable where defendants did not have a reasonable basis for them
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,931 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"