MEMORANDUM in Support re MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Its motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
Holding that a consensus of three circuits was sufficient to establish that the killing of a pet was a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
Holding that the "bald assertion" that unspecified defendants used mail and wire communications to commit fraud does not meet Rule 9(b)'s pleading requirement
Holding that executrix could sue because the Act applies to anyone who "stand in the shoes of the debtor [with] the same authority as the debtor to open and read the letters of the debtor"
Holding that money owed as a result of theft is not "an obligation or alleged obligation of a consumer to pay money arising out of a transaction" and, therefore, does not constitute a debt for purposes of the FDCPA
992 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D. Mass. 2014) Cited 52 times 1 Legal Analyses
Concluding that lender complied with requirements of RESPA governing duty of loan servicer to respond to borrower inquiries when it responded to mortgagors' broad information requests, where lender provided mortgagors with their loan history, a contact person, and included copies of note, mortgage, loan modification documents the mortgagors executed, and then recent appraisal of property
15 U.S.C. § 1692d Cited 1,895 times 22 Legal Analyses
Limiting debt collectors’ ability to use threats of violence, publicize lists of consumers allegedly refusing to pay debts, cause a telephone to ring repeatedly or continuously, or engage someone in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously