§Why CasetextPricing

June Medical Services LLC et al v. Caldwell et al

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction

20 Cited authorities

  1. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,534 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion

  2. Washington v. Glucksberg

    521 U.S. 702 (1997)   Cited 2,743 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no fundamental right to physician-assisted suicide

  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey

    505 U.S. 833 (1992)   Cited 1,885 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional

  4. Harris v. McRae

    448 U.S. 297 (1980)   Cited 1,444 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Hyde Amendment does not violate the First Amendment

  5. Women's Medical Center of Northwest Houston v. Bell

    248 F.3d 411 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 239 times
    Noting that "without violating the Constitution, the State could have required all abortion providers to be licensed"

  6. Anderson v. Jackson

    556 F.3d 351 (5th Cir. 2009)   Cited 178 times
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying preliminary injunction without holding evidentiary hearing where it did not rely on disputed facts in determining whether injunction should issue and where permitted extensive briefing and hear oral argument

  7. Wisconsin Right v. Federal Election

    546 U.S. 410 (2006)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that the plaintiff could bring an as-applied challenge to BCRA despite the Court up-holding the statute on its face

  8. Jackson Women's Health Org. v. Currier

    760 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that a state "may not shift its obligation to respect the established constitutional rights of its citizens to another state"

  9. Planned Parenthood of Greater Tex. Surgical Health Servs. v. Abbott

    734 F.3d 406 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that “obstacle” that are “unrelated to the hospital-admitting-privileges requirement” are irrelevant to the undue-burden inquiry in a facial challenge

  10. K.P. v. Leblanc

    729 F.3d 427 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no standing where defendant lacked authority to enforce statute and therefore could not redress harm

  11. Rule 10 - Form of Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 10   Cited 20,661 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding exhibits attached to complaint may be treated as part of complaint for purposes of ruling on 12(b) motion

  12. Section 300a-7 - Sterilization or abortion

    42 U.S.C. § 300a-7   Cited 54 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting discrimination against abortion providers in the decision whether the grant admitting privileges