§Why CasetextPricing

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Defense et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment

53 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Nixon

    418 U.S. 683 (1974)   Cited 4,087 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254

  2. Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Prot. A.

    532 U.S. 1 (2001)   Cited 1,008 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the determination that records are not inter- or intra-agency "rules out any application of Exemption 5"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

    421 U.S. 132 (1975)   Cited 2,040 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that FOIA does not compel agencies to write or create material to explain disclosed documents

  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General Services

    433 U.S. 425 (1977)   Cited 1,093 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act was not an unconstitutional bill of attainder because former President Nixon "constituted a legitimate class of one"

  5. Kissinger v. Reporters Committee

    445 U.S. 136 (1980)   Cited 899 times
    Holding that in the Freedom of Information Act, the term " ‘Executive Office’ does not include the Office of the President"

  6. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.

    493 U.S. 146 (1989)   Cited 544 times
    Holding that records originally assembled for other purposes can come within Exemption 7 if subsequently compiled for law enforcement purposes

  7. SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. SEC

    926 F.2d 1197 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,698 times
    Holding that information in law enforcement records identifying private individuals is exempt from disclosure unless release is necessary to "confirm or refute compelling evidence that the agency is engaged in illegal activity"

  8. Oglesby v. U.S. Dept. of Army

    920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,544 times
    Holding that FOIA administrative exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional

  9. Central Intelligence Agency v. Sims

    471 U.S. 159 (1985)   Cited 439 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an earlier version of the relevant National Security Act provision "qualifies as a withholding statute under Exemption 3"

  10. Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency

    508 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 627 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding CIA clearance and investigatory processes and related law enforcement techniques and procedures exempt under Exemption 7(E)

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,736 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,169 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  13. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,031 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead

  14. Section 3024 - Responsibilities and authorities of the Director of National Intelligence

    50 U.S.C. § 3024   Cited 167 times
    Protecting “intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized disclosure”

  15. Section 401 - Transferred

    50 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 55 times
    Establishing comprehensive national security program, including Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Counsel, and providing for Congressional oversight of these agencies