§Why CasetextPricing

JTR Enterprises, LLC v. Columbian Emeralds

RESPONSE to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss 94 Claim,, Amended Claim with Reservations Relative to Post-Dismissal Actions, including modification of the Court's August 7, 2012, Order re Status Conference [Doc. 117] JTR's Response to Motivation's Motion to Dismiss its Claim

2 Cited authorities

  1. Cooter Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.

    496 U.S. 384 (1990)   Cited 4,131 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is necessarily an abuse of discretion to apply the wrong legal standard

  2. Baker v. Alderman

    158 F.3d 516 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 258 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court should take into account a party's ability to pay when determining the amount of monetary sanctions to be awarded