18 Cited authorities

Wash. State Grange v. Wa. State Repub. Party
552 U.S. 442 (2008) Cited 1,300 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts should neither "anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it" nor "formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied"
Reno v. Flores
507 U.S. 292 (1993) Cited 1,761 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in the immigration context, minors aged sixteen or seventeen are not "too young or too ignorant to exercise" their right to make a revocable waiver of a removal or deportation hearing
Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
832 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016) Cited 870 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding NRS Chapter 116's opt-in notice scheme is facially unconstitutional due to the absence of mandatory notice provisions
Ezell v. City of Chicago
651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011) Cited 542 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a supplier of firing-range facilities had standing to challenge a Chicago ordinance that burdened its potential customers' firearms training
Kaiser Cement Corp. v. Fischbach Moore, Inc.
793 F.2d 1100 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 1,119 times
Stating that a court "must view the evidence and inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment."
Hart v. Massanari
266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 476 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that an unpublished "disposition is not written in a way that will be fully intelligible to those unfamiliar with the case, and the rule of law is not announced in a way that makes it suitable for governing future cases"
Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.
693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 710 times
Holding that the “flow of commerce ends when goods reach their intended destination”
Mohamed v. Uber Techs., Inc.
836 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2016) Cited 177 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement is not adhesive if there is an opportunity to opt out
Wuchter v. Pizzutti
276 U.S. 13 (1928) Cited 349 times
Holding that, without a requirement that the state official mail the process to the defendant, a statute allowing substituted service on a state official violated the Due Process Clause
Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agr. Imp. Power
869 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1989) Cited 120 times
Holding that an entity designated as a "political subdivision" in the state constitution was not a state actor where the entity, "in the hiring and firing of its employees . . . acts as a private company, that is, in a proprietary manner not in a governmental manner"
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 333,232 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sbw Investment Llc,Et Al.,

18 Cited authorities

Holding that courts should neither "anticipate a question of constitutional law in advance of the necessity of deciding it" nor "formulate a rule of constitutional law broader than is required by the precise facts to which it is to be applied"

Holding that, in the immigration context, minors aged sixteen or seventeen are not "too young or too ignorant to exercise" their right to make a revocable waiver of a removal or deportation hearing

Holding NRS Chapter 116's opt-in notice scheme is facially unconstitutional due to the absence of mandatory notice provisions

Holding that a supplier of firing-range facilities had standing to challenge a Chicago ordinance that burdened its potential customers' firearms training

Stating that a court "must view the evidence and inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment."

Holding that an unpublished "disposition is not written in a way that will be fully intelligible to those unfamiliar with the case, and the rule of law is not announced in a way that makes it suitable for governing future cases"

Holding that the “flow of commerce ends when goods reach their intended destination”

Holding that an arbitration agreement is not adhesive if there is an opportunity to opt out

Holding that, without a requirement that the state official mail the process to the defendant, a statute allowing substituted service on a state official violated the Due Process Clause

Holding that an entity designated as a "political subdivision" in the state constitution was not a state actor where the entity, "in the hiring and firing of its employees . . . acts as a private company, that is, in a proprietary manner not in a governmental manner"

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system