521 U.S. 179 (1997) Cited 541 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "reasonable diligence" was required to invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment in the context of civil RICO by analogy to antitrust cases
Holding that so long as a student receives proper notice of a charge and is suspended on the basis of that charge, justifying the suspension by finding additional violations does not constitute a due process violation
Holding "[a]n appellate court may affirm the district court's [decision] on any ground supported by the Record, even if different from the grounds relied upon by the district court."
Holding that pleading "a viable RICO conspiracy claim" requires more than "conclusory and vague allegations concerning the collective conduct of the 'defendants'"
Holding that RICO enterprise did not exist because, aside from naming the participants, plaintiff failed to allege any facts "as to the scope and duration of the enterprise"
156 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D. Conn. 2000) Cited 22 times
Holding that, for mail and wire fraud claims, a plaintiff must show "defendant's knowing or intentional participation in the scheme" and provide "a strong inference that the defendant possessed fraudulent intent"