26 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 22,604 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sufficient specification of when the injury in fact will occur is necessary
  2. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 4,033 times   193 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
  3. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 20,446 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he activities which establish its `presence' subject it alike to taxation by the state and to suit to recover the tax"
  4. White v. Lee

    227 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,675 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because it “is based on and implements the First Amendment right to petition,” the Noerr–Pennington doctrine “applies equally in all contexts”
  5. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink

    284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 997 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court properly awarded attorneys' fees and costs under the Lanham Act on default judgment, taking plaintiff's allegations as true
  6. Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy

    453 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 807 times
    Holding that a district court "need not permit even limited discovery" where a "plaintiff's claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by the defendants"
  7. Doe v. Unocal Corp.

    248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 789 times
    Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)
  8. Ranza v. Nike, Inc.

    793 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 347 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "total ownership and shared management personnel are alone insufficient to establish the requisite level of control," placement of "[a parent's] directors on the subsidiary's board" does not singularly create an alter-ego relationship
  9. AT&T v. Compagnie Bruxelles Lambert

    94 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 569 times
    Holding that where the trial court rules on jurisdictional issue based on affidavits and without holding an evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing
  10. Easter v. American West Financial

    381 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 393 times
    Holding that borrowers of second mortgage loans had no standing to sue those investment trusts that did not hold a named plaintiff's note because they could not trace the alleged injury in fact to those defendants' actions
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 272,120 times   788 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 84,742 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  13. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 15,295 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  14. Section 410.10 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10   Cited 933 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for jurisdiction over non-residents coextensive with due process requirements
  15. Section 2695.8 - Additional Standards Applicable to Automobile Insurance

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 2695.8   Cited 7 times

    (a) This section enumerates standards which apply to adjustment and settlement of automobile insurance claims. (1) the words "automobile" and "vehicle" are used synonymously. (b) In evaluating automobile total loss claims the following standards shall apply: (1) The insurer may elect a cash settlement that shall be based upon the actual cost of a "comparable automobile" less any deductible provided in the policy. This cash settlement amount shall include all applicable taxes and one-time fees incident