26 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,751 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 5,591 times   236 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
  3. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 22,554 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
  4. White v. Lee

    227 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2,062 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because it “is based on and implements the First Amendment right to petition,” the Noerr–Pennington doctrine “applies equally in all contexts”
  5. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink

    284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,440 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding website-operator defendant's magazine advertisements supported the exercise of jurisdiction where defendant also ran local radio advertisements
  6. Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy

    453 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,022 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court "need not permit even limited discovery" where a "plaintiff's claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by the defendants"
  7. Doe v. Unocal Corp.

    248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 931 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)
  8. Ranza v. Nike, Inc.

    793 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 574 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not an alter ego of its parent corporation, but that if it had been, the parent corporation's contacts could be attributed to the employer to establish personal jurisdiction over the employer
  9. AT&T v. Compagnie Bruxelles Lambert

    94 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 680 times
    Holding that where the trial court rules on jurisdictional issue based on affidavits and without holding an evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing
  10. Easter v. American West Financial

    381 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 418 times
    Holding that class action plaintiffs lacked standing to sue trust companies that "never held a named plaintiff's loan"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,855 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1331 - Federal question

    28 U.S.C. § 1331   Cited 97,127 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
  13. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,800 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  14. Section 410.10 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10   Cited 1,318 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for jurisdiction over non-residents coextensive with due process requirements
  15. Section 2695.8 - Additional Standards Applicable to Automobile Insurance

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10 § 2695.8   Cited 7 times

    (a) This section enumerates standards which apply to adjustment and settlement of automobile insurance claims. (1) the words "automobile" and "vehicle" are used synonymously. (b) In evaluating automobile total loss claims the following standards shall apply: (1) The insurer may elect a cash settlement that shall be based upon the actual cost of a "comparable automobile" less any deductible provided in the policy. This cash settlement amount shall include all applicable taxes and one-time fees incident