34 Cited authorities

  1. Coopers Lybrand v. Livesay

    437 U.S. 463 (1978)   Cited 2,815 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding interlocutory orders appealable if they: "conclusively determine the disputed question, resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment."
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp.

    337 U.S. 541 (1949)   Cited 7,655 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1291 permits appeals from certain decisions "collateral to rights asserted in the action," even when there's no final judgment
  3. Schlaifer Nance Co., Inc. v. Est. of Warhol

    194 F.3d 323 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 493 times
    Holding that a motion describing the sanctionable conduct and the source of authority for the sanction provided notice
  4. Locurto v. Safir

    264 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 396 times
    Holding that an interlocutory appeal is permitted from the denial of immunity at the motion to dismiss phase, even when it is without prejudice, because such a denial is "conclusive with regard to a defendant's right to avoid pre-trial discovery, so long as the validity of the denial of the . . . immunity defense can be decided as a matter of law in light of the record on appeal"
  5. United States v. Indrelunas

    411 U.S. 216 (1973)   Cited 216 times
    Holding that separate document requirement of Rule 58 is mandatory
  6. U.S. v. Schaefer Brewing Co.

    356 U.S. 227 (1958)   Cited 187 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court opinion setting the amount of the refund was not a final judgment where "the action also sought recovery of interest ... from the date of payment to the date of judgment" and the district court's "opinion does not state the date or dates of payment and, hence, did not state facts necessary to compute the amount of interest to be included in the judgment"
  7. Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group

    854 F.2d 1452 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 178 times
    Holding that Rule 11 sanctions may be imposed upon a represented party when the party "had actual knowledge that filing the paper constituted wrongful conduct, e.g. the paper made false statements or was filed for an improper purpose."
  8. Muhammad v. Walmart Stores E., L.P.

    732 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that "the 21-day safe harbor does not apply [when sanctions are initiated by a court sua sponte] and the court may impose sanctions without providing opportunity to withdraw the misstatement."
  9. Weinstock v. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton

    16 F.3d 501 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 85 times
    Finding that ignorance of Federal Rule did not constitute excusable neglect
  10. Rinieri v. News Syndicate Co.

    385 F.2d 818 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 171 times
    Holding that the motion was filed too late
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,946 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 1291 - Final decisions of district courts

    28 U.S.C. § 1291   Cited 88,806 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to the courts of appeals from final decisions of federal district courts "except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court"
  13. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 53,633 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment
  14. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,225 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
  15. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 35,813 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  16. Section 1988 - Proceedings in vindication of civil rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1988   Cited 21,803 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1920 defines the term "costs" as used in Rule 54(d) and enumerates the expenses that a federal court may tax as a cost under the discretionary authority granted in Rule 54(d)
  17. Rule 58 - Entering Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 58   Cited 18,407 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that, after a jury verdict, the Court must enter judgment "in a separate document"
  18. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,043 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  19. Section 1927 - Counsel's liability for excessive costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1927   Cited 8,839 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts the power to charge "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred" due to "unreasonabl[e] and vexatious" conduct
  20. Rule 4 - Appeal as of Right-When Taken

    Fed. R. App. P. 4   Cited 6,045 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting an appeal of right for civil cases where notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after entry of judgment