57 Cited authorities

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 216,328 times 40 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
473 U.S. 432 (1985) Cited 9,707 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class
McDonald v. City of Chicago
561 U.S. 742 (2010) Cited 2,281 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment
Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm'n
432 U.S. 333 (1977) Cited 4,437 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading
Plyler v. Doe
457 U.S. 202 (1982) Cited 3,014 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens
Bray v. Alexandria Clinic
506 U.S. 263 (1993) Cited 1,115 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the proposition that the defendants’ "class-based animus [could] be determined solely by effect" was "[not] supportable"
McBurney v. Young
569 U.S. 221 (2013) Cited 544 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding the Virginia Freedom of Information Act did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause
Shapiro v. Thompson
394 U.S. 618 (1969) Cited 2,288 times
Holding a federal law that applied to residents of the District of Columbia violated the right to travel
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
397 U.S. 137 (1970) Cited 1,700 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a statute addresses "a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits"
Dunn v. Blumstein
405 U.S. 330 (1972) Cited 1,519 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding unlawful a state law permitting only residents who have lived in state for one year to vote
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,775 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Janes et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al

57 Cited authorities

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class

Holding that the Second Amendment applies to the states, through incorporation under the Fourteenth Amendment

Holding that North Carolina's statute banning state grading of apples was discriminatory even though six other states also had no state grading

Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens

Holding that the proposition that the defendants’ "class-based animus [could] be determined solely by effect" was "[not] supportable"

Holding the Virginia Freedom of Information Act did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause

Holding a federal law that applied to residents of the District of Columbia violated the right to travel

Holding that where a statute addresses "a legitimate local public interest, and its effects on interstate commerce are only incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits"

Holding unlawful a state law permitting only residents who have lived in state for one year to vote

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit