§Why CasetextPricing

James v. UMG Recordings, Inc.

MOTION

6 Cited authorities

  1. Costco v. Superior Ct.

    47 Cal.4th 725 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 304 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the privilege "does not extend to subject matter otherwise unprivileged merely because that subject matter has been communicated to the attorney"

  2. Rossi v. Blue Cross

    73 N.Y.2d 588 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 268 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding attorney-client privilege does not apply to communications concerning business matters

  3. Montebello Rose Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations

    119 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 65 times
    Affirming ALRB's conclusion that a certified union continues to enjoy that status after the initial certification year expires

  4. Devlyne v. Lassen Municipal Utility District

    CIV. NO. S-10-0286 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)   Cited 7 times
    Holding "the Shelton criteria apply only when trial and/or litigation counsel are being deposed and the questioning would expose litigation strategy in the pending case"

  5. Optic Plus v. Bausch Lomb Inc.

    37 A.D.3d 1185 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 8 times

    No. CA 06-02260. February 2, 2007. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered June 22, 2006 in a breach of contract action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of plaintiff's motion seeking an in camera review of documents withheld by defendants on the ground of privilege, granted in part defendants' cross motion to compel and granted a conditional order of preclusion. REDNISS MOODY LLP, NEW YORK CITY (MARK WARREN MOODY OF COUNSEL)

  6. In re 3dfx Interactive, Inc.

    347 B.R. 394 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006)   Cited 1 times

    No. 02-55795 JRG, Adversary No. 03-5079. June 21, 2006. Stephen T. O'Neill, Law Offices of Murray and Murray, Cupertino, CA, Robert A. Trodella, Jr., Heller, Ehrman, White and McAuliffe, San Francisco, CA, for Debtor. Sblend A. Sblendorio, Hoge, Fenton, Jones and Appel, Pleasanton, CA, for Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (WAIVER) JAMES R. GRUBE, Bankruptcy Judge. On March 2, 2006, the court heard Trustee's motion to compel the production of documents based on various