§Why CasetextPricing

James McGuinnes v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

MOTION to dismiss Based on Rule 25 With Supporting Memorandum of Law

15 Cited authorities

  1. Carras v. Williams

    807 F.2d 1286 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 165 times
    Holding that request to enjoin participation in state court proceedings became moot once those proceedings had concluded

  2. Cooley v. Granholm

    291 F.3d 880 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that physicians' suit challenging the constitutionality of Michigan's anti-euthanasia statute barring physician-assisted suicide was mooted by retirement of one physician and relocation of other to another state

  3. Heiser v. Reno

    Case No. 3:10-cv-32-J-34MCR (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2012)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 3:10-cv-32-J-34MCR 02-07-2012 STEVEN C. HEISER, Plaintiff, v. LETICIA RENO, M.D., etc.; et al., Defendants. MARCIA MORALES HOWARD ORDER I. Status Plaintiff Steven C. Heiser, an inmate of the Florida penal system proceeding in forma pauperis, initiated this action by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. #1) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Declaration (Doc. #3), Memorandum of Law (Doc. #4), and Appendix (P. Ex.) (Doc. #5) on August 25, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Northern

  4. Hayward v. SSP America, Inc.

    Case No: 6:10-cv-1835-Orl-36DAB (M.D. Fla. Jul. 10, 2012)

    Case No: 6:10-cv-1835-Orl-36DAB 07-10-2012 CHRISTINA HAYWARD, Plaintiff, v. SSP AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Charlene Edwards Honeywell ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on June 22, 2012 (Doc. 33). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker recommends that the Court grant Defendant SSP America, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. 32), and dismiss this action. Neither party

  5. Hoang v. Worldwide Asset Purchasing

    No. 09-185-DRH (S.D. Ill. Dec. 27, 2010)   Cited 1 times

    No. 09-185-DRH. December 27, 2010 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DAVID HERNDON, District Judge I. Introduction Before the Court are two motions filed by Defendants Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC and Freedman, Anselmo, Lindberg Rappe, LLC and Plaintiff Soi Quay Hoang respectively. Defendants have filed a request for sanctions ( See Docs. 34 35) to which Plaintiff Soi Quay Hoang's attorney Edgar Lim has filed a response (Doc. 36). Plaintiff's attorney has also filed a Motion to Substitute Party Plaintiff (Doc

  6. Martin v. Hacsi

    909 So. 2d 935 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that the suggestion of death need not contain anything other than the fact of death

  7. Constantine "DEAN" Paterakis v. S. Dist. of Brevard

    Case No. 6:09-cv-269-Orl-19KRS (M.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2009)

    Case No. 6:09-cv-269-Orl-19KRS. November 8, 2009 ORDER PATRICIA FAWSETT, District Judge This case comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Case by Defendants. (Doc. No. 49, filed Oct. 19, 2009). Plaintiffs have filed no response in opposition. Background This case arises out of the alleged termination of a teacher, Plaintiff Constantine "Dean" Paterakis, for complaining that the school principal, Karen Kise, adjusted the grades that Paterakis gave to his students. Defendants filed

  8. American National Insurance Company v. Glass

    Case No.: 3:07-cv-872-J16TEM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 30, 2008)

    Case No.: 3:07-cv-872-J16TEM. July 31, 2008 ORDER JOHN MOORE II, District Judge Plaintiff's motion for Attorneys' Fees (the "Fees Motion") (Dkt. 24) is before the Court. Plaintiff filed additional material in support of the Fees Motion (Dkts. 33 and 34) and Defendants, Dirk Glass and Krystal Glass (collectively, the "Defendants"), proceeding pro se, filed identical responses in opposition (collectively, the "Response") to the Fees Motion. (Dkts. 35 and 36). For the reasons that follow, the Fees Motion

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,118 times   662 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  10. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 69,891 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 49,013 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  12. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,549 times   186 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

  13. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 10,816 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities

  14. Rule 17 - Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity; Public Officers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 17   Cited 9,221 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Providing that, for this type of entity, "[c]apacity to sue or be sued is determined . . . by the law of the state where the court is located"

  15. Section 733.301 - Preference in appointment of personal representative

    Fla. Stat. § 733.301   Cited 45 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that after a surviving spouse, the person selected by a majority in interest of the heirs or the heir nearest in degree has priority to serve as personal representative