Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A.
534 U.S. 506 (2002) Cited 16,766 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding with regard to a 67-year-old plaintiff and a 59-year-old comparator that " difference of eight years between the age of the person discharged and his replacement . . . is not insignificant"
McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publ'g Co.
513 U.S. 352 (1995) Cited 1,180 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that, under the ADEA, neither reinstatement nor front pay is appropriate when, subsequent to the statutory violation, the plaintiff's employment has been terminated for legitimate reasons
E.E.O.C. v. Ethan Allen, Inc.
44 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 1994) Cited 151 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that shifting explanations developed over time to counter evidence of age discrimination uncovered in state investigation could support inference of discrimination
Fernandez v. the United States Postal Service
804 F. Supp. 448 (E.D.N.Y. 1992) Cited 4 timesNos. CV 87-1265 (ADS), CV 89-0679 (ADS). September 30, 1992 Richard V. Rappaport, Great Neck, N.Y., for plaintiff. Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. by Kevan Cleary, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case concerns a charge against the United States Postal Service of discrimination based on gender and national origin. The plaintiff, who was a part-time temporary clerk in the Postal Service, contends that she was initially discharged