§Why CasetextPricing

Jackson et al v. Segwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al

RESPONSE to 15 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12

44 Cited authorities

  1. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman

    460 U.S. 462 (1983)   Cited 10,599 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs’ claims that the state court acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying plaintiffs’ petitions for waiver were inextricably intertwined with the state-court judgment denying their petitions

  2. Buckley v. Fitzsimmons

    509 U.S. 259 (1993)   Cited 4,125 times
    Holding absolute prosecutorial immunity extends to "making false or defamatory statements during, and related to, judicial proceedings"

  3. Colorado River Water Cons. Dist. v. U.S.

    424 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 8,204 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in limited circumstances, federal courts should abstain from deciding a case when there are related proceedings pending in state court

  4. Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co.

    473 U.S. 479 (1985)   Cited 4,236 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fact that a statute can be "applied in situations not expressly anticipated by Congress does not demonstrate ambiguity. It demonstrates breadth."

  5. Boyle v. United States

    556 U.S. 938 (2009)   Cited 1,144 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a RICO enterprise "need not have a hierarchical structure or a 'chain of command'; decisions may be made on an ad hoc basis and by any number of methods — by majority vote, consensus, a show of strength, etc."

  6. Briscoe v. LaHue

    460 U.S. 325 (1983)   Cited 2,562 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absolute immunity applies to claims of perjured testimony

  7. Reves v. Ernst Young

    507 U.S. 170 (1993)   Cited 1,418 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant "participates" if he "directs" the pattern of racketeering activity

  8. Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.

    547 U.S. 451 (2006)   Cited 851 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a business could not recover against its competitor for a scheme to defraud the New York State tax authority that allowed the defendant to undercut the plaintiff's prices

  9. Maiden v. Rozwood

    461 Mich. 109 (Mich. 1999)   Cited 2,707 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that evidence submitted "after the summary disposition motion was argued" was "not properly before the [trial] court" when deciding the summary disposition motion

  10. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.

    263 U.S. 413 (1923)   Cited 9,787 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal suit was "merely an attempt to get rid of the judgment for alleged errors of law committed" by the state courts

  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 489,703 times   693 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  12. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 15,945 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities

  13. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 14,989 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include

  14. Section 1964 - Civil remedies

    18 U.S.C. § 1964   Cited 6,108 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting civil remedies for RICO violation

  15. Section 418.101 - Short title

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.101   Cited 395 times   2 Legal Analyses

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "worker's disability compensation act of 1969". MCL 418.101 1969, Act 317, Eff. 12/31/1969 ;--Am. 1975, Act 279, Eff. 3/31/1976 .

  16. Section 600.101 - Revised judicature act of 1961; short title

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.101   Cited 118 times

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "revised judicature act of 1961." RJA may be used as an abbreviation for the revised judicature act. MCL 600.101 1961, Act 236, Eff. 1/1/1963.

  17. Section 418.385 - Physical examination of employee; payment; report; copy; evidence; failure of party to provide medical report

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.385   Cited 16 times

    After the employee has given notice of injury and from time to time thereafter during the continuance of his or her disability, if so requested by the employer or the carrier, he or she shall submit himself or herself to an examination by a physician or surgeon authorized to practice medicine under the laws of the state, furnished and paid for by the employer or the carrier. If an examination relative to the injury is made, the employee or his or her attorney shall be furnished, within 15 days of

  18. Section 418.213 - Worker's compensation board of magistrates; establishment; appointment, qualifications, and terms of members; vacancy; reappointment; powers and duties of chairperson; duties of members; term of chairperson; salary of members; employment of staff; rules; assignment and reassignment of magistrates; office space

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 418.213   Cited 7 times

    (1) Consistent with Executive Reorganization Order No. 2011-6, MCL 445.2032, the worker's compensation board of magistrates is established as an autonomous entity in the Michigan administrative hearing system. The board shall consist of 17 members appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate. All members of the board shall be members in good standing of the state bar of Michigan. (2) The members of the board shall be appointed for terms of 4 years. A vacancy caused by the expiration