§Why CasetextPricing

Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.. Document

64 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,544 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,461 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,142 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,254 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  5. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,092 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

  6. Kelly v. Robinson

    479 U.S. 36 (1986)   Cited 1,541 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that restitution orders "necessarily consider[] the penal and rehabilitative interests of the State" and that "[t]hose interests are sufficient to place restitution orders within the meaning of § 523"

  7. Samantar v. Yousuf et al.

    560 U.S. 305 (2010)   Cited 378 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the common law, rather than the FSIA, governs the immunity of foreign officials

  8. Massachusetts v. Morash

    490 U.S. 107 (1989)   Cited 442 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a vacation policy with similar features constituted a payroll practice

  9. Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire

    477 U.S. 207 (1986)   Cited 436 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that admiralty jurisdiction was properly invoked in a suit by survivors of offshore workers who perished in a helicopter crash while being transported from an offshore platform to shore

  10. In re Sharp Intern. Corp.

    403 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 634 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff must satisfy specific pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) to state actual fraudulent transfer claim under New York law

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,637 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,911 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"

  13. Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

    15 U.S.C. § 78j   Cited 12,502 times   165 Legal Analyses
    Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

  14. Section 547 - Preferences

    11 U.S.C. § 547   Cited 8,125 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Seeking to avoid preferential transfers

  15. Section 548 - Fraudulent transfers and obligations

    11 U.S.C. § 548   Cited 6,509 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Seeking to avoid constructively fraudulent transfers

  16. Section 704 - Duties of trustee

    11 U.S.C. § 704   Cited 2,672 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding one of the trustee's duties is to "investigate the financial affairs of the debtor"

  17. Section 102 - Rules of construction

    11 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 1,604 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining "may not" as "prohibitive, and not permissive"

  18. Rule 7009 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7009   Cited 891 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Adopting F.R.Civ.P. 9

  19. Section 78aaa - Short title

    15 U.S.C. § 78aaa   Cited 413 times   12 Legal Analyses

    This chapter may be cited as the "Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970". 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa Pub. L. 91-598, §1(a), Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1636. EDITORIAL NOTES REFERENCES IN TEXTThis chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "This Act", meaning Pub. L. 91-598, Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1636. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES SHORT TITLE OF 1978 AMENDMENTPub. L. 95-283, §1, May 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 249, provided that:

  20. Section 240.15c3-3 - Customer protection-reserves and custody of securities

    17 C.F.R. § 240.15c3-3   Cited 60 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Requiring special reserve accounts to be set up for customer protection

  21. Section 300.503 - Voidable securities transactions

    17 C.F.R. § 300.503   Cited 5 times

    (a) Nothing in these Series 500 Rules shall be construed as limiting the rights of a trustee in a liquidation proceeding under the Act to avoid any securities transaction as fraudulent, preferential, or otherwise voidable under applicable law. (b) Nothing in these Series 500 Rules shall be construed as limiting the right of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, in a direct payment procedure under section 10 of the Act, to reject a claim for cash or a claim for securities if such claim arose