74 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,874 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America

    511 U.S. 375 (1994)   Cited 19,034 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement
  3. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 58,523 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
  4. Valley Forge College v. Americans United

    454 U.S. 464 (1982)   Cited 4,972 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"
  5. Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.

    486 U.S. 800 (1988)   Cited 3,130 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the appeal belonged before the regional circuit because the claims did not arise under patent law
  6. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas

    493 U.S. 215 (1990)   Cited 2,371 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction (quoting McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 (1936))
  7. Baker v. Carr

    369 U.S. 186 (1962)   Cited 5,231 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge Tennessee's apportionment of state representatives when that apportionment "effect[ed] a gross disproportion of representation to voting population"
  8. Browning v. Clinton

    292 F.3d 235 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,328 times
    Holding that when a tortious interference claim is based solely on allegedly defamatory remarks, it is "intertwined" with plaintiff's defamation claim and therefore subject to the same one-year statute of limitations
  9. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth

    300 U.S. 227 (1937)   Cited 3,451 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a request for a declaratory judgment regarding an insured's disability was justiciable
  10. E.E.O.C. v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial

    117 F.3d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,272 times
    Holding that question of whether defendant was a covered entity under ADA is not jurisdictional, but merits related
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,412 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,518 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  13. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,956 times   317 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
  14. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 5,938 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"
  15. Section 1338 - Patents, plant variety protection, copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition

    28 U.S.C. § 1338   Cited 5,399 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Granting exclusive jurisdiction to the district courts "of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, . . . copyrights and trademarks"
  16. Section 12-301 - Limitation of time for bringing actions

    D.C. Code § 12-301   Cited 904 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a three-year statute of limitations on actions "for the recovery of personal property"
  17. Section 100 - Definitions

    35 U.S.C. § 100   Cited 612 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Defining a " ‘joint research agreement’ " as a written agreement between "2 or more persons or entities"
  18. Section 135 - Derivation proceedings

    35 U.S.C. § 135   Cited 286 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Governing interferences
  19. Section 293 - Nonresident patentee; service and notice

    35 U.S.C. § 293   Cited 84 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Vesting exclusive jurisdiction over foreign patentees in the Eastern District of Virginia
  20. Section 291 - Derived patents

    35 U.S.C. § 291   Cited 77 times   13 Legal Analyses

    (a) IN GENERAL.-The owner of a patent may have relief by civil action against the owner of another patent that claims the same invention and has an earlier effective filing date, if the invention claimed in such other patent was derived from the inventor of the invention claimed in the patent owned by the person seeking relief under this section. (b) FILING LIMITATION.-An action under this section may be filed only before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the issuance of the first