24 Cited authorities

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    497 U.S. 871 (1990)   Cited 9,535 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

    507 U.S. 380 (1993)   Cited 7,705 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys
  3. International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's

    939 F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 2,307 times
    Holding court need not accommodate request for continuance when nonmovant has not diligently pursued the discovery of necessary evidence
  4. Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.

    389 F.3d 1291 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 310 times
    Holding that a plaintiff's failure to respond to a motion to dismiss permits the court to treat the motion as conceded
  5. Smith v. District of Columbia

    430 F.3d 450 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 170 times
    Holding that it is an abuse of the court's discretion to consider an untimely filing in the absence of a motion to enlarge demonstrating excusable neglect
  6. Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc.

    697 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 203 times
    Holding that bankruptcy courts have power to authorize retroactive employment of counsel under their broad equity powers
  7. Schrecker v. U.S. Dept. of Justice

    217 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that, where "agency reasonably chose to search the most likely place responsive documents would be located" requiring a "search through millions of documents is not reasonable and therefore not necessary"
  8. In re Vitamins Antitrust Class Actions

    327 F.3d 1207 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 59 times
    Affirming district court's grant of discretionary relief where party filed motion to modify final order twelve days after its entry and two days after the party discovered that it had not opted-out
  9. Central Laborers' Pension Funds v. Griffee

    198 F.3d 642 (7th Cir. 1999)   Cited 29 times
    Stating "the only proper office of a nunc pro tunc order is to correct a mistake in the records; it cannot be used to rewrite history."
  10. Webster v. Pacesetter, Inc.

    270 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2003)   Cited 21 times
    Noting that fault is the most important single factor
  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,334 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."