19 Cited authorities

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc. of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.
463 U.S. 29 (1983) Cited 6,653 times 50 Legal Analyses
Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"
United States v. Mead Corp.
533 U.S. 218 (2001) Cited 2,599 times 30 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Customs classification ruling "has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron " but can "claim respect according to its persuasiveness"
Barnhart v. Walton
535 U.S. 212 (2002) Cited 2,169 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the “‘ 12 month' duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment' and the ‘inability' to work requirements”
Christensen v. Harris County
529 U.S. 576 (2000) Cited 1,895 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that agency interpretations contained in "policy statements, agency manuals, and enforcement guidelines, all of which lack the force of law do not warrant Chevron-style deference"
Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
488 U.S. 204 (1988) Cited 1,721 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”
Burlington Truck Lines v. U.S.
371 U.S. 156 (1962) Cited 1,948 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding a rule invalid under the APA where "the Commission made no findings specifically directed to the choice between two vastly different remedies with vastly different consequences to the carriers and the public . . . [and failed to] articulate any rational connection between the facts found and the choice made"
Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
522 U.S. 359 (1998) Cited 419 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"
Investment Co. Institute v. Camp
401 U.S. 617 (1971) Cited 313 times
Holding that association of investment companies had standing to challenge regulation authorizing banks to operate collective investment funds
Doe v. United States Dept. of Justice
753 F.2d 1092 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 422 times
Holding that claim should not be dismissed if some type of relief, not limited to relief asked for in the complaint, can be awarded
Fox v. Clinton
684 F.3d 67 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Cited 103 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the State Department's denial of the appellant's request for a certificate of loss of nationality that would acknowledge his surrender of U.S. citizenship was “arbitrary and capricious,” because it was not “logical,” “rational,” or “adequately explained”
Section 271 - Infringement of patent
35 U.S.C. § 271 Cited 6,061 times 1055 Legal Analyses
Holding that testing is a "use"
Section 355 - New drugs
21 U.S.C. § 355 Cited 2,252 times 340 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"
Section 355a - Pediatric studies of drugs
21 U.S.C. § 355a Cited 68 times 12 Legal Analyses
(a) Definitions As used in this section, the term "pediatric studies" or "studies" means at least one clinical investigation (that, at the Secretary's discretion, may include pharmacokinetic studies) in pediatric age groups (including neonates in appropriate cases) in which a drug is anticipated to be used, and, at the discretion of the Secretary, may include preclinical studies. (b) Market exclusivity for new drugs (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), if, prior to approval of an application

Innovator Enterprises, Inc. v. Jones

19 Cited authorities

Holding that " `settled course of behavior embodies the agency's informed judgment that, by pursuing that course, it will carry out the policies [of applicable statutes or regulations]'"

Holding that a Customs classification ruling "has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron " but can "claim respect according to its persuasiveness"

Holding that the “‘ 12 month' duration requirements apply to both the ‘impairment' and the ‘inability' to work requirements”

Holding that agency interpretations contained in "policy statements, agency manuals, and enforcement guidelines, all of which lack the force of law do not warrant Chevron-style deference"

Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”

Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

Holding that association of investment companies had standing to challenge regulation authorizing banks to operate collective investment funds

Holding that claim should not be dismissed if some type of relief, not limited to relief asked for in the complaint, can be awarded

Holding that the State Department's denial of the appellant's request for a certificate of loss of nationality that would acknowledge his surrender of U.S. citizenship was “arbitrary and capricious,” because it was not “logical,” “rational,” or “adequately explained”

Holding that testing is a "use"

Granting the court discretion to change the date on which an ANDA may be approved if "either party to the action failed to reasonably cooperate in expediting the action"