§Why CasetextPricing

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation

MOTION

14 Cited authorities

  1. Lucent Technologies v. Gateway

    580 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 746 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "we see little evidentiary basis under Georgia-Pacific" for the damages award

  2. Fillmore v. Page

    358 F.3d 496 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 474 times
    Finding force was de minimis where inmate experienced "discomfort and sore wrists"

  3. Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.

    694 F.3d 51 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 330 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that 6% royalty rate damages theory should be excluded on remand because it was based on insufficiently comparable licenses

  4. In re Berman

    629 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 139 times
    Holding debtor must have been trustee before wrongdoing

  5. Cornell University v. Hewlett-Packard Company

    609 F. Supp. 2d 279 (N.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 63 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the EMVR requires adequate proof that the infringing components must be the basis for customer demand for the entire machine; the individual infringing and non-infringing components must be sold together so that they constitute a functional unit or are parts of a complete machine or single assembly of parts and the individual infringing and non-infringing components must be analogous to a single functioning unit, and noting that the requirements are additive, not alternative

  6. Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc.

    798 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2011)   Cited 21 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because a reasonable royalty can only be based on “the use made of the invention by the infringer,” the hypothetical license must be limited to the subset of a computer program that actually infringed, not the entire computer program

  7. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. v. Berman

    427 B.R. 432 (N.D. Ill. 2010)   Cited 10 times
    Noting that "courts have generally construed `fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity' in § 523 as applying only in circumstances akin to breach of a formal trust — that is, to debts involving property that could be the res of a trust and a relationship between the debtor and creditor that establishes a fiduciary relationship encompassing that property."

  8. BKCAP, LLC v. Captec Franchise Trust 2000-1

    688 F.3d 810 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 4 times
    Reviewing prejudgment interest decision for abuse of discretion

  9. Neopost Industrie B.V. v. PFE International, Inc.

    403 F. Supp. 2d 669 (N.D. Ill. 2005)   Cited 9 times

    No. 04 C 5047. December 5, 2005. Lynn Hagman Murray, Gary M. Miller, Mark H. Carnow, Peter S. Roeser, Grippo Elden, Chicago, IL, Donald J. Ranft, Matthew C. Wagner, Philip J. Miolene, Collen Law Associates, P.C., Ossining, NY, for Plaintiffs. Patrick A. Fleming, John F. Shonkwiler, Novack Macey LLP, Allison Michelle Dudley, Charles Cobey Kinne, Michael Joseph H. Baniak, Baniak, Pine Gannon, Chicago, IL, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CASTILLO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Neopost Industrie

  10. Hulme v. Madison County

    188 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (S.D. Ill. 2001)   Cited 12 times
    Holding an Illinois county redistricting plan with a 9.3% overall deviation range was unconstitutional because plaintiffs showed that the plan was drawn with no effort to draw "districts ... as nearly of equal population as practicable."

  11. Rule 52 - Findings and Conclusions by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 52   Cited 26,471 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a "reviewing court must give due regard to the trial court's opportunity to judge the witnesses' credibility"