550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 266,697 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
572 U.S. 118 (2014) Cited 2,835 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff seeking to bring suit under a federal statute must show not only that he has standing under Article III, but also that his "complaint fall within the zone of interests protected by the law" invoked
Holding that Octane Fitness 's interpretation of an "exceptional" case under the Patent Act controls its interpretation under § 1117 because the language is identical and because Congress referenced the Patent Act in passing § 1117
Holding the SIAA's two-year statute of limitations, previously codified at 46 U.S.C. § 745, was not jurisdictional and therefore subject to equitable tolling
552 U.S. 491 (2008) Cited 488 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that President George W. Bush's memorandum in response to an international court's decision was "not a rule of domestic law binding in state and federal courts"
Holding that the "substantial effects" test was met when telephones were shipped through the United States and the primary defendant was a U.S. corporation who negotiated sales from a Florida office
Holding that a party suing for breach must allege " a contract; a breach of that contract; damages flowing therefrom; and that the party performed its own contractual duties"
Finding plausible sales diversion injury where plaintiff alleged that customers would "forego" purchasing its products and instead purchase defendant's products
N.J. Stat. § 56:4-1 Cited 232 times 2 Legal Analyses
No merchant, firm or corporation shall appropriate for his or their own use a name, brand, trade-mark, reputation or goodwill of any maker in whose product such merchant, firm or corporation deals. N.J.S. § 56:4-1 Amended by L.1975, c.107, s.2.