Holding expert physician's opinions admissible based on that physician's use of "knowledge and experience" "against a background of peer-reviewed literature" to evaluate a patient's medical records and imaging studies
Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"
Holding that, in order to avoid summary judgment, the plaintiffs in a FELA action were required to produce expert testimony that exposure to chemicals played a part in causing their injuries
Holding that landowner's testimony based on “lot method” was properly excluded in condemnation case involving property that owner proposed to develop as mobile home park where subdivision development was speculative