17 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 21,107 times   195 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fed. R. Evid. 702 authorizes a "preliminary assessment of whether the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony [of an expert] is scientifically valid and of whether that reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue"
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 10,023 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  3. General Electric Co. v. Joiner

    522 U.S. 136 (1997)   Cited 3,835 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    43 F.3d 1311 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 1,035 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert testimony was inadmissible based on its unreliable methodology notwithstanding "the impressive qualifications of plaintiffs' experts"
  5. Primiano v. Cook

    598 F.3d 558 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 462 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that doctor was qualified to testify that prosthetic did not perform in the manner reasonably to be expected even though he did not know why it failed
  6. Claar v. Burlington Northern R. Co.

    29 F.3d 499 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 372 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in order to avoid summary judgment, the plaintiffs in a FELA action were required to produce expert testimony that exposure to chemicals played a part in causing their injuries
  7. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    838 F. Supp. 2d 929 (C.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 137 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Song-Beverley does not impose a privity requirement
  8. Gallagher ex rel. National Packaging Solutions Group Trust v. Southern Source Packaging, LLC

    568 F. Supp. 2d 624 (E.D.N.C. 2008)   Cited 88 times
    Determining that just because supplementation may occur at any time prior to the pretrial disclosure deadline, a party may not simply hold onto information until the pretrial deadline
  9. Cabrera v. Cordis Corporation

    134 F.3d 1418 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that Blais's opinions were "the antithesis of the scientifically reliable expert opinion admissible under Daubert and Rule 702"
  10. U.S. v. 99.66 Acres of Land

    970 F.2d 651 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that landowner's testimony based on “lot method” was properly excluded in condemnation case involving property that owner proposed to develop as mobile home park where subdivision development was speculative
  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 21,133 times   183 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" may assist the trier of fact
  12. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 18,513 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
  13. Rule 104 - Preliminary Questions

    Fed. R. Evid. 104   Cited 2,752 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of facts necessary to establish relevance