9 Cited authorities

Russin v. Picciano Son
54 N.Y.2d 311 (N.Y. 1981) Cited 1,429 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding "[a]n implicit precondition to this duty to provide a safe place to work is that the party charged with that responsibility have the authority to control the activity bringing about the injury to enable it to avoid or correct an unsafe condition"
Wolters Kluwer Financial v. Scivantage
564 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 175 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court had not made an adequate finding of bad faith as to a party's voluntary dismissal filing by including only a footnote in its conclusion that misstated the law on imputing bad faith
In re Fitch, Inc.
330 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 194 times
Noting that a motion to quash is "entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court"
Crosby v. City of New York
269 F.R.D. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) Cited 69 times
Denying in part and granting in part DANY's motion to quash plaintiffs' subpoenas
Nxivm Corp. v. O'Hara
241 F.R.D. 109 (N.D.N.Y. 2007) Cited 55 times
Finding exception inapplicable where moving party failed to demonstrate that "particular communication or document at issue" used in furtherance of contemplated or ongoing fraud
Wolters Kluwer Fi. v. Scivantage, Adnane Charchour
525 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) Cited 10 times
No. 07 CV 2352(HB). November 30, 2007. Brian Jason Fischer, Harry Sandick, Charles B. Sklarsky, Jenner Block LLP (NYC), New York City, for Plaintiff. Khaled A. El Nabli, Nabli Associates, P.C., George O. Richardson, III, Sullivan Worcester LLP (NY), Frank H. Wohl, Lankler Siffert Wohl LLP, Pery D. Krinsky, Law Offices of Michael S. Ross, Robert Katzberg, Kaplan Katzberg, New York City, for Defendants. AMENDED OPINION ORDER HAROLD BAER JR., District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION To fulfill its promise of
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 95,836 times 658 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 45 - Subpoena
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 16,712 times 105 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"
Section 241 - Construction, excavation and demolition work
N.Y. Lab. Law § 241 Cited 7,219 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring areas being excavated to be constructed, shored, equipped, guarded, arranged, operated and conducted as to provide "reasonable and adequate protection and safety" to the persons employed therein

In Re: World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation

9 Cited authorities

Holding "[a]n implicit precondition to this duty to provide a safe place to work is that the party charged with that responsibility have the authority to control the activity bringing about the injury to enable it to avoid or correct an unsafe condition"

Holding that the district court had not made an adequate finding of bad faith as to a party's voluntary dismissal filing by including only a footnote in its conclusion that misstated the law on imputing bad faith

Noting that a motion to quash is "entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court"

Denying in part and granting in part DANY's motion to quash plaintiffs' subpoenas

Finding exception inapplicable where moving party failed to demonstrate that "particular communication or document at issue" used in furtherance of contemplated or ongoing fraud

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

Requiring areas being excavated to be constructed, shored, equipped, guarded, arranged, operated and conducted as to provide "reasonable and adequate protection and safety" to the persons employed therein