66 Cited authorities

  1. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 59,120 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

    426 U.S. 438 (1976)   Cited 2,516 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding that materiality may be resolved at summary judgment "if the established omissions are so obviously important to an investor that reasonable minds cannot differ on the question of materiality"
  3. Powell v. McCormack

    395 U.S. 486 (1969)   Cited 3,134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained
  4. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

    174 Ill. 2d 482 (Ill. 1996)   Cited 972 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements "not made by Suzuki but by Suzuki dealers . . . cannot be the basis of a common law fraud count against Suzuki unless plaintiffs have adequately alleged that the dealers were the agents of Suzuki"
  5. Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.

    109 F.3d 338 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 504 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in reviewing a state claim pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction, federal courts apply state substantive law and federal procedural law
  6. Bardin v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

    136 Cal.App.4th 1255 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 307 times
    Holding that the use of less expensive tubular steel exhaust manifolds did not violate public policy because the defendant made no representation about the composition of the manifolds and the plaintiffs did not allege a safety concern or a violation of the warranty
  7. Swersky v. Dreyer Traub

    219 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 316 times
    Holding that "the firm may be held liable to the same extent as the individual defendant"
  8. W.W. Vincent Co. v. First Colony Life Ins. Co.

    351 Ill. App. 3d 752 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004)   Cited 247 times
    Holding that purchasing corporation stated valid claim of fraudulent misrepresentation by inducement, based on knowingly false statements, by transferring corporation, that assets transferred to purchasing corporation included general agents' contract
  9. Kolupa v. Roselle Park Dist

    438 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 225 times
    Holding that a religious discrimination plaintiff need only say that the employer "held] the worker's religion against him"
  10. Day v. AT & T Corp.

    63 Cal.App.4th 325 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 188 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that these California statutes may make even true statements actionable if "couched in such a manner that it is likely to mislead or deceive the consumer, such as by failure to disclose other relevant information"
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 39,838 times   331 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  12. Section 2201 - Creation of remedy

    28 U.S.C. § 2201   Cited 24,976 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment
  13. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,013 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  14. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,743 times   68 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  15. Section 12A:1-201 - General definitions

    N.J. Stat. § 12A:1-201   Cited 171 times
    Describing language as conspicuous if it is in larger or contrasting type
  16. Section 440.1201 - Definitions

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1201   Cited 147 times
    Providing that a term or clause is conspicuous “when it is so written that a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to have noticed it”
  17. Section 810 ILCS 5/2-607 - Effect of acceptance; notice of breach; burden of establishing breach after acceptance; notice of claim or litigation to person answerable over

    810 ILCS 5/2-607   Cited 122 times

    (1) The buyer must pay at the contract rate for any goods accepted. (2) Acceptance of goods by the buyer precludes rejection of the goods accepted and if made with knowledge of a non-conformity cannot be revoked because of it unless the acceptance was on the reasonable assumption that the non-conformity would be seasonably cured but acceptance does not of itself impair any other remedy provided by this Article for non-conformity. (3) Where a tender has been accepted (a) the buyer must within a reasonable