Helus v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of United States
309 F. Supp. 2d 1170 (N.D. Cal. 2004) Cited 9 timesDenying leave to amend, because it was filed two years after the deadline for filing a motion to amend, and while the defendant's motion for summary judgment was pending
TM Patents v. IBM
107 F. Supp. 2d 352 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) Cited 3 timesNo. 97 CIV. 1529(CM)(MDF). July 28, 2000. Stephen B. Judlowe, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil Judlowe, L.L.P., New York, NY, for TM Patents. Christopher A. Hughes, Morgan Finnegan, L.L.P., New York, NY, for IBM. DECISION AND ORDER DISPOSING OF ALL PENDING MOTIONS McMAHON, District Judge. The various pending motions are disposed of as follows: 1. TM's motion for Leave to Rely on the Statement of Ethan Miller is granted, and IBM's cross-motion to strike the statement is denied. 2. IBM's motion for summary
Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 90,557 times 91 Legal AnalysesFinding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Cited 33,726 times 51 Legal AnalysesAdopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
Section 1498 - Patent and copyright cases
28 U.S.C. § 1498 Cited 506 times 95 Legal AnalysesGranting the United States Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction to adjudicate patent infringement suits against the federal government under a takings theory