Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
437 U.S. 340 (1978) Cited 4,459 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."
McKart v. United States
395 U.S. 185 (1969) Cited 1,611 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that issue which involved statutory interpretation did not require exhaustion because it required no agency expertise, was not a matter of discretion, and would not have been aided by any additional administrative action
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals v. Richardson-Vicks
902 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1990) Cited 241 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act precluded claims under the Lanham Act related to labeling an ingredient "inactive" when the Food and Drug Administration had not yet determined whether the ingredient was active or inactive
McPeek v. Ashcroft
202 F.R.D. 31 (D.D.C. 2001) Cited 41 times 1 Legal AnalysesAuthorizing a "test-run" of costly data restoration
Powell v. South Jersey Marina, Inc.
3:CV-04-2611 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2007) Cited 1 times3:CV-04-2611. August 1, 2007 MEMORANDUM THOMAS VANASKIE, Chief Judge This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' motion to compel (a) the deposition of Defendant Ocean Yachts' ("Ocean Yachts") President, John Leek, III ("Leek"), and (b) the production of 12 issues of Ocean Yachts' bi-annual customer newsletter, "Passages," produced from 2001 to 2006. Following an effort to resolve the issue without judicial involvement, Plaintiffs filed this motion on March 2, 2007. Ocean Yachts responded
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal AnalysesAllowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system