§Why CasetextPricing

In Re: Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation

MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.'s Amended Complaints

29 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 271,655 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are not required "to credit a complaint's conclusory statements without reference to its factual context"

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 284,407 times   370 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. United States v. Bestfoods

    524 U.S. 51 (1998)   Cited 1,466 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ownership and control is insufficient to demonstrate an alter-ego relationship

  4. Doe v. Unocal Corp.

    248 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 966 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "court may consider evidence" on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)

  5. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.

    290 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (C.D. Cal. 2003)   Cited 711 times
    Holding that plaintiffs could prevail if they could prove at trial that certain transfers made pursuant to a Ponzi scheme were made within the limitations period of California's UFTA

  6. Kendall v. Visa

    518 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 604 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that leave to amend would be futile where plaintiff was granted leave to amend once before and the amended complaint contained the same deficiencies as the prior complaint

  7. DM Research, Inc. v. Coll. of Am. Pathologists

    170 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 1999)   Cited 247 times
    Holding that discovery was not warranted at the motion to dismiss stage

  8. In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

    586 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (N.D. Cal. 2008)   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District of Columbia's consumer protection statute is a "comprehensive statute designed to provide procedures and remedies for a broad spectrum of practices which injure consumers", and thus, the plaintiffs could maintain a claim for price fixing (quoting Atwater v. District of Columbia Dep't of Consumer & Reg. Affairs, 566 A.2d 462, 465 (D.C. 1989) )

  9. Name.Space, Inc. v. Internet Corp.

    795 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that because the plaintiff failed to state an antitrust violation, trademark claim, or other unlawful act, it also failed to state an unfair business practices claim under California law

  10. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

    116 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (C.D. Cal. 2015)   Cited 68 times
    Holding it “improper” for a plaintiff to assert an unpled theory of liability in an opposition to a motion to dismiss

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 366,773 times   968 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss