32 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 189,377 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there cannot be a genuine issue of material fact where the nonmoving party fails to make a sufficient showing to establish the existence of an essential element
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 10,023 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  3. Whitmore v. Arkansas

    495 U.S. 149 (1990)   Cited 2,325 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a third party does not have "standing to challenge the validity of a death sentence imposed on a capital defendant who has elected to forgo his right of appeal"
  4. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n

    434 U.S. 412 (1978)   Cited 3,276 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for a defendant to recoup attorneys fees under § 706(k) of Title VII, a court must find that the plaintiff litigated his or her claim beyond the point where it became “frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless” or where plaintiff acted in bad faith
  5. Mesnick v. General Elec. Co.

    950 F.2d 816 (1st Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,760 times
    Holding that, for summary judgment purposes, factual disputes must be resolved in favor of the nonmovant
  6. Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Actavis, Inc.

    570 U.S. 136 (2013)   Cited 221 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reverse payment settlements . . . can sometimes violate the antitrust laws"
  7. In re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation

    906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006)   Cited 428 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporate officers did not violate their fiduciary duties when they decided not to terminate a company president for cause
  8. Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

    632 F.3d 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2011)   Cited 361 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence relying on "25 percent rule of thumb," which was a tool used to approximate the reasonable royalty rate the manufacturer of patented product would be willing to offer to pay to the patentee during a hypothetical negotiation, was inadmissible under Daubert since it failed to tie a reasonably royalty base to facts of case at issue
  9. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp.

    318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)   Cited 639 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that “royalties received by the patentee for the licensing of the patent in suit” is a relevant factor for the jury to consider
  10. Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.

    361 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2004)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a “legislature's decision to offer claimants separate administrative and judicial paths through which to rectify the same wrongs” will inevitably lead to different treatment of factually identical claims
  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 21,373 times   183 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" may assist the trier of fact