43 Cited authorities

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
459 U.S. 56 (1982) Cited 3,190 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal"
Landis v. North American Co.
299 U.S. 248 (1936) Cited 8,277 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.
398 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 1,513 times
Holding a stay, although "theoretically" subject to modification, was a reviewable collateral order because "the district court did not impose a time limit on the stay or note circumstances that might result in its modification"
City of Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Baykeeper
254 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 831 times
Holding that the law of the case doctrine is "wholly inapposite" when a district court reconsiders an order over which it retains jurisdiction
Gomez v. Vernon
255 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 632 times
Holding that "repeated threats of transfer because of [the plaintiff's] complaints about the administration of the [prison] library" were sufficient to ground a retaliation claim
Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd.
593 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 1,078 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the arbitrator does have the power to determine whether various provisions in the contract are void
Cmax, Inc. v. Hall
300 F.2d 265 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 1,257 times
Holding that a delay "is not the kind of prejudice which should move a court to deny a requested postponement"
Mediterranean Enters., Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.
708 F.2d 1458 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 503 times
Holding that it is within the discretion of a district court to enter a stay, regardless whether the parallel proceeding is "judicial, administrative, or arbitral in character" (quoting Leyva v. Certified Grocers, 593 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir. 1979))
Flynt Distributing Co., Inc. v. Harvey
734 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1984) Cited 452 times
Holding that it was within the district court's discretion to rely on hearsay statements
Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia
464 U.S. 30 (1983) Cited 136 times
In Norfolk Redevelopment Housing Authority v. Chesapeake Potomac Telephone Co. ("Norfolk"), 464 U.S. 30, 104 S.Ct. 304, 78 L.Ed.2d 29 (1983), the Supreme Court held that the URA "did not change the long-established common law principle that a utility forced to relocate from a public right-of-way must do so at its own expense; it is not a `displaced person' as that term is defined in the [URA]."
Section 1801 - Definitions
50 U.S.C. § 1801 Cited 280 times 10 Legal Analyses
Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States
Section 1806 - Use of information
50 U.S.C. § 1806 Cited 169 times 4 Legal Analyses
Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
Section 3502 - Admissibility in evidence of eye witness testimony
18 U.S.C. § 3502 Cited 34 times
Providing that the admissibility of custodial statements turns only on whether they are voluntarily made

In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

43 Cited authorities

Holding that the filing of a notice of appeal "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal"

Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"

Holding a stay, although "theoretically" subject to modification, was a reviewable collateral order because "the district court did not impose a time limit on the stay or note circumstances that might result in its modification"

Holding that the law of the case doctrine is "wholly inapposite" when a district court reconsiders an order over which it retains jurisdiction

Holding that "repeated threats of transfer because of [the plaintiff's] complaints about the administration of the [prison] library" were sufficient to ground a retaliation claim

Holding that the arbitrator does have the power to determine whether various provisions in the contract are void

Holding that a delay "is not the kind of prejudice which should move a court to deny a requested postponement"

Holding that it is within the discretion of a district court to enter a stay, regardless whether the parallel proceeding is "judicial, administrative, or arbitral in character" (quoting Leyva v. Certified Grocers, 593 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir. 1979))

Holding that it was within the district court's discretion to rely on hearsay statements

Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States

Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"

Providing that the admissibility of custodial statements turns only on whether they are voluntarily made