61 Cited authorities

  1. Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police

    491 U.S. 58 (1989)   Cited 24,824 times
    Holding that official capacity state officer suits for prospective injunctive relief are suits against a "person" under § 1983 even though a "State" is not a "person" under that statute
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Env't

    523 U.S. 83 (1998)   Cited 11,076 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding this court may raise the issue of "statutory jurisdiction" sua sponte
  3. Los Angeles v. Lyons

    461 U.S. 95 (1983)   Cited 7,686 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
  4. Vermont Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel. Stevens

    529 U.S. 765 (2000)   Cited 1,623 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that States are not subject to private FCA actions
  5. Tyler v. Cain

    533 U.S. 656 (2001)   Cited 1,474 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "made" means "held" under identical language in § 2244(b) and that it must be held retroactive by the Supreme Court
  6. United States v. Nixon

    418 U.S. 683 (1974)   Cited 4,135 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254
  7. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.

    503 U.S. 30 (1992)   Cited 1,808 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the existence of "plausible" interpretations that would not permit recovery "is enough to establish that a reading imposing monetary liability on the Government is not ‘unambiguous' and therefore should not be adopted"
  8. Alderman v. United States

    394 U.S. 165 (1968)   Cited 2,331 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the victim of a warrantless search may object to the use of its fruits "not because he had any interest in the seized items as 'effects' protected by the Fourth Amendment, but because they were the fruits of an unauthorized search of his house, which is itself expressly protected by the Fourth Amendment"
  9. Davis v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury

    489 U.S. 803 (1989)   Cited 870 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the relevant inquiry is whether the inconsistent tax treatment is directly related to, and justified by, `significant differences between the two classes'"
  10. United States v. Hubbell

    530 U.S. 27 (2000)   Cited 449 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding foregone conclusion exception did not apply to request for broad categories such as "tax records" when the government made no showing "that it had any prior knowledge of either the existence or the whereabouts of the 13,120 pages of documents ultimately produced" under an immunity agreement
  11. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,767 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  12. Section 2520 - Recovery of civil damages authorized

    18 U.S.C. § 2520   Cited 1,358 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Permitting recovery of actual and punitive damages, as well as a reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of litigation reasonably incurred
  13. Section 2707 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2707   Cited 461 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief to those "aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind"
  14. Section 1801 - Definitions

    50 U.S.C. § 1801   Cited 280 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Defining "United States person" to be a "citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence" or certain unincorporated associations or corporations with ties to the United States
  15. Section 3504 - Litigation concerning sources of evidence

    18 U.S.C. § 3504   Cited 216 times
    Providing that when an aggrieved party alleges that "evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act [under the Omnibus Act] or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act, the opponent of the claim shall affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act"
  16. Section 1806 - Use of information

    50 U.S.C. § 1806   Cited 172 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Allowing in camera , ex parte review of the legality of electronic surveillance under FISA Subchapter I if "the Attorney General files an affidavit under oath that disclosure or an adversary hearing would harm the national security of the United States"
  17. Section 403-1 - Transferred

    50 U.S.C. §§ 403-1   Cited 66 times
    Providing that "[t]he Director of National Intelligence shall protect intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized disclosure"
  18. Section 2712 - Civil actions against the United States

    18 U.S.C. § 2712   Cited 59 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "any person who is aggrieved by any willful violation of this chapter . . . may commence an action in United States District Court against the United States to recover money damages."
  19. Section 402 - Transferred

    50 U.S.C. § 402   Cited 54 times

    50 U.S.C. § 402 EDITORIAL NOTES CODIFICATIONSection 402, comprising section 101 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as section 3021 of this title. The National Security Agency Act of 1959, Pub. L. 86-36, formerly set out as a note under section 402, was editorially reclassified as chapter 47 of this title.

  20. Section 1810 - Civil liability

    50 U.S.C. § 1810   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an " aggrieved person" is entitled to recover " actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages of $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation, whichever is greater"