139 Cited authorities

  1. Hartman v. Moore

    547 U.S. 250 (2006)   Cited 2,224 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Bivens remedy may be available for malicious prosecution, but the plaintiff had to allege and prove lack of probable cause
  2. Connick v. Myers

    461 U.S. 138 (1983)   Cited 5,866 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer need not "allow events to unfold to the extent that the disruption of the office and the destruction of working relationships is manifest before taking action"
  3. Kansas v. Hendricks

    521 U.S. 346 (1997)   Cited 2,364 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that definitions of mental illness in civil commitment statutes need not track precise medical definitions
  4. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,917 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.

    418 U.S. 323 (1974)   Cited 3,882 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private defamation plaintiff cannot recover punitive damages without proving actual malice
  6. Hill v. Colorado

    530 U.S. 703 (2000)   Cited 1,279 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding content neutral a ban on "picketing," "demonstrating," "protest, education, or counseling" even though it may require the government "to review the content of the statements made"
  7. Smith v. Maryland

    442 U.S. 735 (1979)   Cited 2,145 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding that use of pen register was not a "search" for Fourth Amendment purposes
  8. Central Hudson Gas Elec. v. Public Serv. Comm'n

    447 U.S. 557 (1980)   Cited 2,052 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on commercial speech must directly advance a substantial governmental interest
  9. National Archives and Records Admin. v. Favish

    541 U.S. 157 (2004)   Cited 831 times
    Holding that "[g]iven FOIA's pro-disclosure purpose," a less stringent standard whereby a requester need only "produce evidence that would warrant a belief by a reasonable person" "is more faithful to the statutory scheme" in some contexts
  10. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

    508 U.S. 49 (1993)   Cited 1,134 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding litigants immune from an antitrust claim under Noerr-Pennington immunity
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,675 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 101 - Definitions

    11 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 26,731 times   210 Legal Analyses
    Defining "securities clearing agency" by reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  13. Section 2510 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2510   Cited 4,254 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[i]nvestigative or law enforcement officer" as an officer "empowered by law to conduct investigations of or to make arrests for [certain] offenses . . . and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of such offenses"
  14. Section 605 - Unauthorized publication or use of communications

    47 U.S.C. § 605   Cited 3,646 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting broad discretion to courts in the award of statutory damages
  15. Section 2518 - Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2518   Cited 2,897 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that some investigative techniques may be “too dangerous”
  16. Section 2511 - Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

    18 U.S.C. § 2511   Cited 2,784 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a penalty on persons who “intentionally intercept ... any wire, oral, or electronic communication”
  17. Section 2520 - Recovery of civil damages authorized

    18 U.S.C. § 2520   Cited 1,345 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting recovery of actual and punitive damages, as well as a reasonable attorney's fee and other costs of litigation reasonably incurred
  18. Section 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

    26 U.S.C. § 6103   Cited 1,338 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing an individual's right to privacy with regard to disclosure of tax returns
  19. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,327 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"
  20. Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2703   Cited 1,208 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"
  21. Section 61.19 - Detariffing of international and interstate, domestic interexchange services

    47 C.F.R. § 61.19   Cited 2 times

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, or by Commission order, carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international and interstate, domestic interexchange services shall not file tariffs for such services. (b) Carriers that are nondominant in the provision of international and domestic, interstate, interexchange services are permitted to file tariffs for dial-around 1+ services. For the purposes of this paragraph, dial-around 1+ calls are those