5 Cited authorities

  1. Staton v. Boeing Co.

    327 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,501 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representation was adequate even though the class contained both supervisors and rank-and-file employees
  2. In re Cavanaugh

    306 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 261 times
    Observing that the "Reform Act clearly leaves the choice of class counsel in the hands of the lead plaintiff
  3. In re Oxford Health Plans, Inc.

    192 F.R.D. 111 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)   Cited 98 times
    Finding "[t]he Court believes on reflection that it probably has the power to designate a Class Representative under Rule 23 who is not a Lead Plaintiff, simply because there is nothing in the statute which prevents it."
  4. Greenberg v. Bear Stearns Co., Inc.

    80 F. Supp. 2d 65 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the PSLRA “does not mandate, nor does it suggest, that a Court approved lead plaintiff must re-publish a notice of the purported class after an amended complaint is filed.... In cases where amended complaints encompassed the same claims and securities, but different class periods, courts have generally found that ‘the efficiency of republication outweighs the marginal fairness gains of notifying class members of an extended class period.’ ”
  5. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 6,352 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party