10 Cited authorities

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) Cited 27,467 times 244 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael
526 U.S. 137 (1999) Cited 13,187 times 31 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
70 F.3d 255 (2d Cir. 1995) Cited 4,537 times
Holding that court has no jurisdiction to review order where it is not mentioned in notice of appeal that expressly lists other orders
Lindsey v. Normet
405 U.S. 56 (1972) Cited 802 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.
158 F.3d 548 (11th Cir. 1998) Cited 772 times
Holding that courts should avoid "the confusion and conflation of admissibility issues with issues regarding the sufficiency of [a party's] evidence"
U.S. v. Valencia
600 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 2010) Cited 453 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring the admission of underlying records “would contravene the plain language and purposes of Rule 1006 ”
Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
381 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2004) Cited 248 times
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in accepting a jury's initial verdict where the court reasonably concluded that the verdict form accurately captured the intended verdict, and that the jurors had simply misjudged the legal effect of their responses
Padillas v. Stork-Gamco, Inc.
186 F.3d 412 (3d Cir. 1999) Cited 257 times
Holding that in limine hearings are encouraged when courts are concerned with the factual, rather than legal, dimensions of the evidence
Medisim Ltd. v. BestMed LLC
10 Civ. 2463 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2012) Cited 86 times
10 Civ. 2463 (SAS) 04-23-2012 MEDISIM LTD., Plaintiff, v. BESTMED LLC, Defendant. For Medisim Ltd.: Richard H. Brown, Esq. Gerald Levy, Esq. Keith J. McWha, Esq. Day Pitney LLP For BestMed LLC: Nicholas L. Coch, Esq. Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, LLP Talivaldis Cepuritis, Esq. Joseph M. Kuo, Esq. Anita M. Cepuritis, Esq. Olson & Cepuritis, LTD. Shark A. Scheindlin MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHIR A A. SCHEINDLIN, U.S.D.J.: I. INTRODUCTION Medisim Ltd. ("Medisim") brings this action against
United States v. Apple Inc.
952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) Cited 38 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that individual agreements between book publishers and Apple, Inc. to raise the retail price of e-books constituted an illegal antitrust conspiracy

In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation

10 Cited authorities

Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"

Holding that court has no jurisdiction to review order where it is not mentioned in notice of appeal that expressly lists other orders

Holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing

Holding that courts should avoid "the confusion and conflation of admissibility issues with issues regarding the sufficiency of [a party's] evidence"

Holding that requiring the admission of underlying records “would contravene the plain language and purposes of Rule 1006 ”

Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in accepting a jury's initial verdict where the court reasonably concluded that the verdict form accurately captured the intended verdict, and that the jurors had simply misjudged the legal effect of their responses

Holding that in limine hearings are encouraged when courts are concerned with the factual, rather than legal, dimensions of the evidence

Holding that individual agreements between book publishers and Apple, Inc. to raise the retail price of e-books constituted an illegal antitrust conspiracy