8 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,328 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Beard v. Banks

    548 U.S. 521 (2006)   Cited 1,693 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that encouraging progress toward rehabilitation serves legitimate penological objectives
  3. Norman v. Apache Corp.

    19 F.3d 1017 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 787 times
    Holding that while Rules 8 and 9(b) are to be harmonized, "Rule 8 has never been read to eviscerate Rule 9(b)'s requirement that an averment of fraud must be stated with particularity."
  4. Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.

    60 F.3d 213 (5th Cir. 1995)   Cited 415 times
    Concluding that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction where a defendant charged with intentional infliction of emotional distress had been fraudulently joined
  5. Peterson v. Schimek

    729 So. 2d 1024 (La. 1999)   Cited 112 times
    Finding same language as in policy to cover non-scheduled rental property
  6. Billiot v. Terrebonne Sher.

    735 So. 2d 17 (La. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 18 times
    In Billiot, the court found that the issue of whether a policy of insurance provides coverage is a purely legal question only in the context of motions for summary judgment and not where a factual finding is necessary in order to reach the coverage issue.
  7. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,775 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  8. Section 1983 - Law for the parties; performance in good faith

    La. Civ. Code art. 1983   Cited 174 times
    Stating contracts have effect of law for parties