43 Cited authorities

Daimler AG v. Bauman
571 U.S. 117 (2014) Cited 5,861 times 237 Legal Analyses
Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
471 U.S. 462 (1985) Cited 17,086 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.
Calder v. Jones
465 U.S. 783 (1984) Cited 4,702 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding a California court had personal jurisdiction over individual defendants when the defendants had not visited the state in connection with an allegedly defamatory article and "[we]re not responsible for the circulation of the article in California"
IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann
9 F.3d 1049 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 1,709 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "district court may assert personal jurisdiction over the parties to the related state-law claims even if personal jurisdiction is not otherwise available ...." provided that "a federal statute authorizes nationwide service of process, and the federal and state claims derive from a common nucleus of operative fact"
California Liquor Dealers v. Midcal Aluminum
445 U.S. 97 (1980) Cited 651 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding ban violated the Sherman Act
Southern New England Telephone v. Global Naps
390 F. App'x 44 (2d Cir. 2010) Cited 738 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a clear statement from Congress is required before we conclude that a statute withdraws the original jurisdiction of the district courts"
Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A.
722 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2013) Cited 594 times
Holding that the court "need look no further" than the letter in which defendant "consented to 'submit to personal jurisdiction in the City and State of New York for any claim or action arising from this transaction'" to establish personal jurisdiction
Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL
732 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2013) Cited 536 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that, while the "mere maintenance" of a bank account in the United States is insufficient, the use of a bank account "as an instrument to achieve the very wrong alleged" is sufficient to establish minimum contacts
APWU v. Potter
343 F.3d 619 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 642 times
Finding that “Plaintiffs fail to articulate” their need for jurisdictional discovery
Distefano v. Carozzi North America, Inc.
286 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2001) Cited 510 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that in deciding pre-discovery whether personal jurisdiction exists, the trial court must "construe the pleadings . . . in the light most favorable to [Plaintiff], resolving all doubts in [its] favor."
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 25 - Private rights of action
7 U.S.C. § 25 Cited 280 times 4 Legal Analyses
Granting federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over private claims brought under the CEA

In re: Commodity Exchange, Inc., Gold Futures and Options Trading Litigation

43 Cited authorities

Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"

Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

Holding a California court had personal jurisdiction over individual defendants when the defendants had not visited the state in connection with an allegedly defamatory article and "[we]re not responsible for the circulation of the article in California"

Holding ban violated the Sherman Act

Holding that "a clear statement from Congress is required before we conclude that a statute withdraws the original jurisdiction of the district courts"

Holding that the court "need look no further" than the letter in which defendant "consented to 'submit to personal jurisdiction in the City and State of New York for any claim or action arising from this transaction'" to establish personal jurisdiction

Holding that, while the "mere maintenance" of a bank account in the United States is insufficient, the use of a bank account "as an instrument to achieve the very wrong alleged" is sufficient to establish minimum contacts

Finding that “Plaintiffs fail to articulate” their need for jurisdictional discovery

Holding that in deciding pre-discovery whether personal jurisdiction exists, the trial court must "construe the pleadings . . . in the light most favorable to [Plaintiff], resolving all doubts in [its] favor."

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Granting federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over private claims brought under the CEA